Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Virtual colonography.

P Bauerfeind1, W Luboldt, J F Debatin

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Bailliere'S Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology
|October 13, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential endoscopic and surgical removal of giant rectal adenomas extending to the dentate line.

Techniques in coloproctology·2018
Same author

[Pharyngoesophageal diverticulum].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen·2017
Same author

Diagnostic use of endoscopic full-thickness wall resection (eFTR)-a novel minimally invasive technique for colonic tissue sampling in patients with severe gastrointestinal motility disorders.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2017
Same author

Safe and successful resection of difficult GI lesions using a novel single-step full-thickness resection device (FTRD<sup>®</sup>).

Surgical endoscopy·2017
Same author

Establishment of Over-The-Scope-Clips (OTSC®) in daily endoscopic routine.

United European gastroenterology journal·2017
Same author

<sup>18</sup>FDG-PET-CT improves specificity of preoperative lymph-node staging in patients with intestinal but not diffuse-type esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2016
Same journal

Preface.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2001
Same journal

Liver transplantation of patients in end-stage cirrhosis.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2001
Same journal

The hepatopulmonary syndrome.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2001
Same journal

Splenomegaly, hypersplenism and coagulation abnormalities in liver disease.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2001
Same journal

Early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2001
Same journal

Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Bailliere's best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology·2001
See all related articles

CT-colonography and MR-colonography offer advanced 3D imaging for colorectal screening. These techniques provide virtual endoscopic views, comparing favorably with traditional methods like colonoscopy.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Cross-sectional imaging is emerging as an alternative for colorectal cancer screening.
  • Current methods include CT-colonography (using air) and MR-colonography (using paramagnetic contrast).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the technical aspects of CT- and MR-colonography.
  • To critically compare these techniques with each other and with conventional colonoscopy and barium enema.

Main Methods:

  • CT-colonography utilizes air insufflation for colonic imaging.
  • MR-colonography employs an enema with paramagnetic contrast.
  • Both generate large 3D datasets for comprehensive colonic assessment.
  • Sophisticated post-processing allows multiplanar and virtual endoscopic views.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both CT- and MR-colonography provide detailed 3D visualization of the colon.
  • Virtual endoscopic capabilities enhance internal colonic assessment.
  • The chapter critically evaluates the pros and cons of each modality.

Conclusions:

  • CT- and MR-colonography are advanced imaging techniques for colorectal screening.
  • These methods offer detailed colonic visualization and virtual endoscopy.
  • They present viable alternatives to conventional colonoscopy and barium enema.