Related Experiment Videos
Automated external defibrillators in long-term care facilities are cost-effective
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio 42567-0769, USA.
Prehospital Emergency Care
|October 25, 2000
Summary
Equipping long-term care facilities with automated external defibrillators (AEDs) is cost-effective, costing $87,837 per life saved. This assumes a 25% survival rate for cardiac arrest patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF).
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Emergency Medicine
- Health Economics
Background:
- Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a critical event in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).
- Prompt defibrillation is crucial for survival in cases of ventricular fibrillation (VF).
- The cost-effectiveness of deploying automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in LTCFs remains an important consideration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost per life saved by equipping LTCFs with AEDs.
- To determine the economic viability of AED implementation in these settings.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of cardiac arrest data from LTCFs (1994-1997) in a mid-sized U.S. city.
- Estimation of four-year costs for AED acquisition, maintenance, and staff training.
- Calculation of cost per life saved based on a projected 25% survival rate for VF patients.
Main Results:
- The estimated cost per life saved was $87,837, assuming a 25% survival rate for VF patients to hospital discharge.
- Sensitivity analysis showed costs ranging from $62,741 to $439,184 per life saved with varying survival rates (5%-35%).
- Adjusting costs by half or double yielded costs per life saved of $43,918 and $175,674, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in LTCFs present a cost-effective intervention for saving lives.
- Achieving a 25% survival rate for cardiac arrest patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF) is key to this cost-effectiveness.
- The findings support the strategic placement of AEDs in long-term care settings.