Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing student evaluation instruments to measure instructor effectiveness.

B Raingruber1, K Bowles

  • 1Division of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, California State University, Sacramento, USA. walkerbj@csus.edu

Nurse Educator
|October 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcome of definitive fractionated radiation followed by exenteration of the nasal cavity in dogs with sinonasal neoplasia: 16 cases.

Veterinary and comparative oncology·2014
Same author

Contributors to frequent telehealth alerts including false alerts for patients with heart failure: a mixed methods exploration.

Applied clinical informatics·2014
Same author

Primary diagnosis and surveillance of white spot syndrome virus in wild and farmed crawfish (Procambarus clarkii, P. zonangulus) in Louisiana, USA.

Diseases of aquatic organisms·2009
Same author

Being with feelings as a recognition practice: developing clients' self-understanding.

Perspectives in psychiatric care·2002
Same author

Building a vision for the future: strategic planning in a shared governance nursing organization.

Seminars for nurse managers·2001
Same author

The relationship of critical-thinking skills and the clinical-judgment skills of baccalaureate nursing students.

The Journal of nursing education·2000
Same journal

The 7 Rights of AI: A Framework for Safe and Ethical AI Use in Nursing Education.

Nurse educator·2026
Same journal

Pulse Surveys to Drive Iterative Course Improvement.

Nurse educator·2026
Same journal

The 2-Minute "Red Flag Scan": Teaching Students Rapid Clinical Prioritization in Acute Care.

Nurse educator·2026
Same journal

Tag, You're It: A Two‑Phase Simulation Approach for Engagement and Learning.

Nurse educator·2026
Same journal

A Practical Framework for Designing Competency-Based Simulation: Supporting Faculty Through Micro-Course Design With Progressive Indicators.

Nurse educator·2026
Same journal

Inflated Grades, Real Consequences: Time to Fix Nursing Education's Overdue Grade Inflation Crisis.

Nurse educator·2026
See all related articles

This study developed tailored student evaluation tools for faculty performance across diverse educational settings. These tools aim to enhance teaching quality in master's and baccalaureate programs.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Assessment
  • Faculty Development
  • Higher Education Pedagogy

Background:

  • Effective faculty evaluation is crucial for improving instructional quality in higher education.
  • Existing student evaluation tools may not adequately capture performance across varied educational contexts.
  • Tailored assessment instruments are needed to reflect specific teaching environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the development of four distinct tools for student evaluation of faculty performance.
  • To create instruments suitable for master's and baccalaureate level programs.
  • To address the need for context-specific evaluation methods in diverse educational settings.

Main Methods:

  • Development of four specialized evaluation tools.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on distinct educational settings: clinical-direct, on-campus laboratory, clinically precepted, and didactic.
  • Application in master's and baccalaureate level programs.

    • Main Results:

    • Successfully developed four tailored tools for faculty performance evaluation.
    • Tools designed for specific clinical and didactic educational environments.
    • Provided a framework for context-specific student feedback.

    Conclusions:

    • Student evaluation tools should be customized to the educational setting and delivery mode for improved instruction.
    • The developed tools offer a model for context-sensitive faculty performance assessment.
    • Tailored evaluations can contribute to more effective faculty development and enhanced teaching quality.