Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critical care computing. Past, present, and future.

A Seiver1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, California, USA. adam.seiver@forsythe.stanford.edu

Critical Care Clinics
|November 9, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endovascular stent-graft placement for treatment of traumatic penetrating subclavian artery injury.

The Journal of trauma·2000
Same author

Covering the "open abdomen": a better technique.

The American surgeon·1998
Same author

Optimizing physician access to surgical intensive care unit laboratory information through mobile computing.

Proceedings : a conference of the American Medical Informatics Association. AMIA Fall Symposium·1996
Same author

Support for information management in critical care: a new approach to identify needs.

Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care·1995
Same author

Multisite evaluation of a continuous intraarterial blood gas monitoring system.

Anesthesiology·1994
Same author

Coordinating and communicating care in the hospital of the future.

Trustee : the journal for hospital governing boards·1993
Same journal

Critical Care and Contagion: Evolving Frontiers of Infectious Diseases in the Modern Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Advances and Challenges in Sepsis Care in Low-Resource Settings.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

The Respiratory Triple Pandemic in the Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiology, Clinical Features and Management of COVID-19, Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Stewardship for the Intensivist.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Infection Prevention and Control in the Intensive Care Unit.

Critical care clinics·2026
Same journal

Antibiotic Considerations in the Critically Ill: Empiric Choices and Dosing.

Critical care clinics·2026
See all related articles

Intensive care unit (ICU) computing systems need evidence of cost reduction and quality improvement to move beyond early adopters. Addressing organizational factors is key to widespread adoption and making ICU computing the standard of care.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Health Informatics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Rapid advancements in processing power, networks, and bandwidth offer powerful tools for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) computing.
  • The first three generations of ICU computing systems were pioneered by innovators and early adopters.
  • A significant portion of the healthcare sector still relies on paper-based systems, highlighting a gap in technology adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the necessary steps for extending advanced ICU computing to the majority of healthcare providers.
  • To emphasize the need for compelling evidence demonstrating cost reduction and quality improvement through ICU computing.
  • To explore the preconditions required for the successful widespread adoption of fourth-generation ICU systems.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the challenges in transitioning from paper-based systems to advanced computing in ICUs.
  • Review of experiences from other industries regarding technology adoption and organizational change.
  • Identification of fundamental issues including clinical organization, roles, behavior, and incentives.

Main Results:

  • Compelling evidence of cost reduction and quality improvement is crucial for broader adoption.
  • Addressing fundamental organizational and behavioral factors is a prerequisite for proving the benefits of computing technology.
  • Fourth-generation systems hold the potential to realize the promise of computing in ICUs.

Conclusions:

  • Successful integration of advanced ICU computing requires more than technological advancement; it necessitates organizational readiness.
  • Overcoming barriers related to clinical practice, roles, and incentives is essential for widespread adoption.
  • Achieving the status of standard of care for ICU computing depends on meeting these preconditions and realizing the potential of upcoming system generations.