Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think.

P Croskerry1

  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. dghosp@crhb.ns.ca

Academic Emergency Medicine : Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
|November 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Survey to Determine Decision-Making Styles of Working Paramedics and Student Paramedics.

CJEM·2016
Same author

Better clinical decision making and reducing diagnostic error.

The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh·2011
Same author

Emergency medicine: A practice prone to error?

CJEM·2007
Same author

Setting the educational agenda and curriculum for error prevention in emergency medicine.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2000
Same author

The feedback sanction.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·2000
Same author

Clinical decision making: an emergency medicine perspective.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine·1999
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Understanding cognitive biases in emergency medicine (EM) is crucial for effective clinical decision-making. Recognizing these thinking patterns helps minimize errors and improve patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive science
  • Medical education
  • Emergency medicine

Background:

  • Emergency medicine (EM) practice is characterized by complexity, uncertainty, and time pressure.
  • Effective EM performance requires expertise in procedural, affective, and cognitive domains.
  • Cognitive science research identifies predictable biases influencing decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore cognitive biases relevant to emergency medicine.
  • To understand how these biases impact clinical decision-making in EM.
  • To identify strategies for improving cognitive processes in EM.

Main Methods:

  • Review of cognitive science literature on biases.
  • Analysis of the unique clinical environment of emergency medicine.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of heuristic thinking strategies used in EM.

    • Main Results:

    • Cognitive biases significantly influence clinical decision-making in EM.
    • Heuristics, while often effective, can lead to errors in complex EM scenarios.
    • The EM environment necessitates specific cognitive strategies due to its inherent pressures.

    Conclusions:

    • Awareness of cognitive biases is essential for EM practitioners.
    • Developing strategies to overcome cognitive obstacles can improve teaching and reduce clinical errors.
    • Further interdisciplinary research is needed to understand and enhance cognitive processes in EM.