Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: are they simply cumulative-frequency effects?

M B Lewis1, S Gerhand, H D Ellis

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, P.O. Box 901, CF1 3YG, Cardiff, UK. lewismb@cardiff.ac.uk

Cognition
|November 14, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduplication of visual stimuli.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

Covert face recognition without prosopagnosia.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

Face processing impairments and delusional misidentification.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same author

A 29-year-old female with progressive myoclonus and cognitive decline.

Case reports in neurological medicine·2013
Same author

Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature.

Australian dental journal·2011
Same author

Theory of Mind: Deaf and Hearing Children's Comprehension of Picture Stories and Judgments of Social Situations.

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2004
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Cross-linguistic differences in incremental planning under uncertainty.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Cumulative frequency, not separate age of acquisition (AoA) and word frequency, predicts reading times. Mathematical analysis and re-analysis of existing data support this parsimonious explanation for word processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Computational Linguistics

Background:

  • Word reading and production times are influenced by word frequency and age of acquisition (AoA).
  • Previous models assumed independent additive effects of AoA and frequency on reaction times.
  • A cumulative-frequency hypothesis, suggesting total word encounters predict reaction times, was previously rejected.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To mathematically demonstrate that a cumulative-frequency hypothesis can explain the observed additive effects of AoA and frequency.
  • To re-analyze existing influential studies to assess their consistency with the cumulative-frequency hypothesis.
  • To challenge the rejection of the cumulative-frequency hypothesis as the most parsimonious explanation for word processing effects.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Mathematical modeling of word acquisition and processing.
  • Statistical re-analysis of data from four key psycholinguistic studies.
  • Comparison of predictions from cumulative-frequency and independent effects models.

Main Results:

  • Mathematical derivation shows that curvilinear learning within a cumulative-frequency framework predicts additive effects of AoA and frequency.
  • Re-analysis of four influential studies indicates their data are consistent with the cumulative-frequency hypothesis.
  • Evidence supporting independent effects of AoA and frequency was found to be reconcilable with cumulative frequency.

Conclusions:

  • The cumulative-frequency hypothesis provides a parsimonious explanation for both age of acquisition and word frequency effects on reading times.
  • There is no empirical evidence to refute the cumulative-frequency hypothesis.
  • The findings suggest a unified explanation for word processing dynamics based on total exposure.