Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
Stroop interference and negative priming: problems with inferences from null results
P Marí-Beffa1, A F Estévez, S Danziger
1School of Psychology, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales. pbeffa@bangor.ac.uk
Abstract:
The Stroop color-naming effect has often been taken as evidence for the automaticity of word processing (MacLeod, 1991). Recently, Besner, Stolz, and Boutilier (1997) reported that coloring a single letter instead of the whole word eliminated the Stroop effect. From this finding, they concluded that word processing could not be purely automatic, since it can be prevented. We asked whether the elimination of the Stroop effect is sufficient evidence for concluding that the word is not processed. Combining Besner et al.'s manipulation with a negative-priming procedure, we found intact negative priming from the prime color word in the absence of a Stroop effect. This result clearly indicates that the meaning of the prime word was processed. The findings highlight the importance of using converging methods to evaluate lack of processing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Framing Effects
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
First Impression

