Examination of regulatory cross-talk between the decay accelerating factor-binding fimbrial/afimbrial adhesins and

N Holden1, C Cotterill, D Gally

  • 1Department of Veterinary Pathology, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.

Insights

The protein DaaA, similar to regulator AFAA-III, does not repress type 1 fimbriae switching like PapB. PapB, not DaaA, reduced type 1 fimbriae expression, suggesting PapB

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bacteriology

Background:

  • Type 1 fimbriae are crucial virulence factors in uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC).
  • Regulation of type 1 fimbriae expression involves complex genetic pathways, including the FimB/FimE switch.
  • PapB is a known regulator involved in the expression of P-fimbriae, but its interaction with type 1 fimbriae is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the regulatory role of DaaA protein in type 1 fimbriae expression.
  • To compare the regulatory function of DaaA with PapB concerning type 1 fimbriae switching.
  • To identify potential cross-talk mechanisms between P-fimbriae and type 1 fimbriae regulatory systems.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative sequence analysis of DaaA and afimbrial adhesin regulator AFAA-III.
  • Assessment of FimB OFF to ON switching in bacterial strains expressing DaaA and PapB.
  • Quantification of type 1 fimbriae expression levels in static Luria-Bertani (LB) media.

Main Results:

  • DaaA exhibits 98% sequence identity to afimbrial adhesin regulator AFAA-III.
  • Unlike PapB, DaaA did not repress the FimB OFF to ON switching in strain AAEC370A.
  • PapB, but not DaaA, significantly reduced type 1 fimbriae expression in static LB media.

Conclusions:

  • DaaA does not appear to directly repress type 1 fimbriae switching.
  • PapB plays a role in downregulating type 1 fimbriae expression, suggesting regulatory cross-talk.
  • The amino terminus of PapB is a potential domain involved in the observed cross-talk with type 1 fimbriae regulation.

Related Concept Videos

Studying the Cytoskeleton01:17

Studying the Cytoskeleton

The cytoskeletal architecture can be studied using different microscopic and biochemical techniques. Electron microscopy was instrumental in discovering the cytoskeletal architecture around the 1960s, which allowed obtaining structural information at a high-resolution level. However, the sample preparation procedure often limits this ability in biological samples. Several protocols have been developed over the years to optimize sample preparation. In one of the protocols known as rotary...
Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments01:14

Generation of Straight or Branched Actin Filaments

The straight or branched structure formation of actin filaments is controlled by nucleating proteins such as the formins and Arp2/3 complex. Formin-mediated assembly results in straight filaments, whereas Arp2/3 protein complex-mediated assembly results in branched actin filaments.
Arp2/3 Complex
Arp2/3 complex is a seven-subunit complex consisting of two proteins similar to actin- Arp2 and Arp3, and five other subunits that help keep Arp2 and Arp3 inactive. When required, the complex is...
Formation of Higher-order Actin Filaments01:11

Formation of Higher-order Actin Filaments

The polymerization of G-actin monomers into filamentous F-actin is a multi-step process. Once the F-actins are formed, they can bundle together in different arrangements to form higher-order networks and regulate cellular functions. Common examples include the formation of lamellipodia and filopodia at the cell's leading edge by actin reorganization in a migrating cell. The microvilli on the brush border epithelial cells are also formed through the F-actin network.
The high-order actin networks...
Mechanism of Filopodia Formation01:39

Mechanism of Filopodia Formation

Filopodia are thin, actin-rich cellular protrusions that play an important role in many fundamental cellular functions. They vary in their occurrence, length, and positioning in different cell types, suggesting their diverse roles.
Their main function is to guide migrating cells during normal tissue morphogenesis or cancer metastasis by recognizing and making initial contacts with the extracellular matrix. However, they can also act as stationary cell anchors or help to establish communication...
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions01:17

Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions

Integrins act both as extracellular input receivers and as intracellular processing activators. As their name suggests, integrins are entirely integrated into the membrane structure. Their hydrophobic membrane-spanning regions interact with the phospholipid bilayer's hydrophobic region. These membrane receptors provide extracellular attachment sites for effectors like hormones and growth factors. They activate intracellular response cascades when their effectors are bound and active.
Some...
Adherens Junctions01:24

Adherens Junctions

Strong contact points between adjacent cells anchor them to each other, forming tissues. Such anchoring junctions are of two types –  adherens junctions and desmosomes. Adherens junctions are abundant in tissues such as  epithelium and endothelium, forming a continuous zone of adhesion called the adhesion belt. In other tissues, such as  heart muscle, they appear as clusters, linking the cells to produce coordinated heart muscle contraction.
Adherens Junctions are Dynamic
The endothelial cells...