On assessing individual differences in rumination on sadness
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2026

Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
M Conway1, P A Csank, S L Holm
1Department of Psychology, and Center for Research in Human Development, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. conway1@vax2.concordia.ca
Abstract:
The Rumination on Sadness Scale (RSS), an individual-difference measure of rumination on sadness, was developed as an alternative to the Ruminative Responses scale of the Response Styles Questionnaire (RRRSQ; Nolen-Hoeksema & Morrow, 1991). Research has shown the RRRSQ to consist of multiple, not highly intercorrelated factors; only I factor explicitly addresses rumination. In Study 1, a 1-factor solution to a principal components analysis was shown to hold for responses to the RSS. The RSS was also shown to be reliable. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validity of the RSS were assessed. In Study 3, individuals with high RSS scores exhibited more distress regarding current concerns with the introduction of a delay period (to allow them to ruminate) after a sad mood induction.
Related Concept Videos
Introspection
Coping Strategies: Emotion Focused
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Traits, Mood, and Subjective Wellbeing
Neuroticism and Emotional...
Self-Discrepancy Theory

