Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Glycemic control and outcome of diabetic patients after successful percutaneous coronary revascularization
D Hasdai1, R A Rizza, D E Grill
1Department of Cardiology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.
Insights
This study found that the degree of blood sugar control in diabetic patients did not affect their long-term outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR). Good, moderate, or poor glycemic control showed no significant difference in survival rates post-procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR) historically exhibit poorer clinical outcomes.
- Understanding factors influencing post-PCR outcomes in this high-risk group is crucial for improving patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of glycemic control, measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, on the long-term prognosis of diabetic patients following successful PCR.
- To determine if pre-procedural hyperglycemia influences the risk of all-cause death or myocardial infarction after revascularization.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of diabetic patients who underwent successful PCR between 1979 and 1998 was analyzed.
- Glycemic control was assessed using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, categorized as good (<8.0%), moderate (8.0%-10.0%), or poor (>10.0%).
- Outcomes, including all-cause death and the composite of death/myocardial infarction, were evaluated over a median follow-up period of 3.2 to 4.7 years.
Main Results:
- Analysis of HbA1c as a continuous variable showed no significant impact on mortality or the composite endpoint.
- When analyzed categorically, patients with moderate and poor glycemic control did not demonstrate a significantly higher risk of death or death/myocardial infarction compared to those with good control.
- Hazard ratios for death and death/myocardial infarction were comparable across all glycemic control categories.
Conclusions:
- The degree of glycemic control at the time of percutaneous coronary revascularization does not appear to influence long-term outcomes in diabetic patients.
- These findings suggest that factors other than immediate pre-procedural glycemic status may be more critical for determining post-PCR prognosis in this population.
Objective:
Our purpose was to examine whether the outcome of diabetic patients after successful percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCR) is influenced by the degree of control of hyperglycemia at the time of revascularization.
Background:
Diabetic patients have a worse outcome after PCR.
Methods:
We examined whether the degree of glycemic control (HbA(1c) levels) affected the occurrence of all-cause death and death/myocardial infarction among diabetic patients after successful PCR from October 1979 through December 1998. HbA(1c) was analyzed both as a continuous and a categorical variable (good [HbA(1c) <8.0%, n = 700], moderate [8.0% < or = HbA(1c) < or =10%, n = 442], or poor [HbA(1c) >10%, n = 231] control).
Results:
HbA(1c) levels were determined at a median (25th, 75th interquartiles) of 3 (1, 10) days after the index procedure for patients with good control, 2 (1, 7) days for moderate control, and 2 (1, 6) days for poor control. Median follow-up after successful PCR was 3.2 (1.2, 6.1) years, 3.9 (1.7,6.3) years, and 4.7 (2.1, 7.1) years, respectively. HbA(1c) as a continuous variable did not have an impact on either death (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.04 [0.98-1.10]) or death/myocardial infarction (1.02 [0.98-1.07]). As a categorical variable, patients with moderate and poor control had a similar hazard of death (0.99 [0.78-1.26] and 1. 14 [0.86-1.52], respectively) and death/myocardial infarction (1.01 [0.82-1.24] and 1.12 [0.87-1.45], respectively) relative to those with good control.
Conclusions:
The degree of glycemic control among diabetic patients at the time of their index intervention did not have an impact on long-term outcomes after successful PCR.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Diabetic Retinopathy