Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing a perioperative peer performance appraisal system.

D E Mathews1

  • 1Providence Centralia Hospital, Centralia, Wash., USA.

AORN Journal
|January 6, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article details the development and implementation of a peer appraisal system for nursing staff in a rural surgical department. The process involved careful planning and execution for effective staff evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complications of neodymium:YAG cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·1999
Same author

Use of ubiquitin fusions to augment protein expression in transgenic plants.

Plant physiology·1999
Same author

Clinical grand rounds. Idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy.

Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society·1996
Same author

What is your diagnosis? Multiple sclerosis.

Optometry clinics : the official publication of the Prentice Society·1996
Same author

Mechanistic aspects of tagetitoxin inhibition of RNA polymerase from Escherichia coli.

Biochemistry·1994
Same author

Adverse reactions during retinal fluorescein angiography.

Journal of the American Optometric Association·1994

Area of Science:

  • Nursing Management
  • Surgical Services
  • Healthcare Administration

Background:

  • A rural, hospital-based surgical suite with 22 staff members required a structured approach to performance evaluation.
  • Existing appraisal methods were insufficient for the diverse nursing staff, including full-time, part-time, and per diem nurses, technologists, aides, and educators.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the systematic development and implementation of a peer appraisal process for nursing staff.
  • To provide a replicable model for other surgical departments seeking to enhance staff evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • The article outlines the sequential steps undertaken by the surgical department from the initial concept to the full implementation of the peer appraisal system.
  • Key stages included defining objectives, designing the appraisal tool, training staff, and piloting the process.

Main Results:

  • The implementation of a peer appraisal process was successfully achieved within the surgical department.
  • The process aimed to foster professional growth and improve the quality of care through constructive feedback.

Conclusions:

  • The successful development and implementation of a peer appraisal process can enhance nursing staff performance and departmental operations.
  • This initiative offers valuable insights for healthcare organizations looking to establish similar staff evaluation systems.