Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

10:54
Preparation and Evaluation of 99mTc-labeled Tridentate Chelates for Pre-targeting Using Bioorthogonal Chemistry
Published on: February 4, 2017
Evaluation of an alternative radiochemical purity testing method for technetium-99m sestamibi
A L Luebke1, D M Wilary, D W Mahoney
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
|January 6, 2001
Summary
The miniature and regular 31 ET paper strip methods for measuring technetium-99m-sestamibi radiochemical purity are unreliable. These methods produced a high false-positive rate, making them unacceptable for accurate diagnostic testing.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear medicine
- Radiopharmaceutical chemistry
- Analytical chemistry
Background:
- Accurate measurement of radiochemical purity (RCP) is critical for radiopharmaceutical quality control.
- 99mTc-sestamibi is a widely used myocardial perfusion imaging agent.
- Standard RCP testing methods can be time-consuming.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of two alternative RCP measurement methods for 99mTc-sestamibi.
- To compare the performance of miniaturized and regular-sized Whatman 31 ET paper strips against standard thin-layer chromatography (TLC).
Main Methods:
- Comparison of three RCP measurement methods: standard TLC, miniaturized 31 ET paper strip, and regular 31 ET paper strip.
- 30 experimental runs performed in triplicate (n=90) across an RCP range of 82%-98%.
- Samples were prepared to ensure 50% had RCP values below the 90% limit.
Main Results:
- Both 31 ET methods showed strong correlation with TLC (r=0.92-0.94) but tended to overestimate RCP, especially below 95%.
- False-positive rates were high: 27% for miniature 31 ET and 33% for regular 31 ET.
- Test/retest reliability was 99% for TLC and regular 31 ET, and 91% for TLC and miniature 31 ET.
Conclusions:
- The miniature and regular 31 ET paper strip methods are not suitable for determining the RCP of 99mTc-sestamibi due to high false-positive rates.
- These alternative methods are unacceptable for clinical diagnostic use.
- Standard TLC remains the preferred method for accurate RCP determination.

