Related Experiment Videos
Long-term outcome in patients with unstable angina treated by coronary balloon angioplasty
T Przewlocki1, P Pieniazek, W Tracz
1Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University, Ul. Pradnicka 80, 31-202, Cracow, Poland.
Insights
Patients with unstable angina (UA) undergoing balloon angioplasty experienced more complications and re-interventions than those with stable angina (SA). Despite higher cardiac events, long-term survival was similar, with UA being an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Balloon angioplasty is a common treatment for coronary artery disease.
- Outcomes may differ between patients with stable angina (SA) and unstable angina (UA).
- Long-term follow-up is crucial for assessing the efficacy and safety of angioplasty in different angina classifications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 5-year outcomes of balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina (SA) versus unstable angina (UA).
- To identify risk factors for adverse events following angioplasty.
- To evaluate the impact of different unstable angina classifications on long-term results.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 472 patients with SA and 158 patients with UA undergoing balloon angioplasty.
- 5-year follow-up to assess clinical success, periprocedural complications, restenosis, myocardial infarction, cardiac mortality, re-intervention rates, and event-free survival.
- Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors.
Main Results:
- Clinical success rates were similar, but periprocedural complications were higher in the UA group (22.3% vs. 11.1%).
- UA patients had significantly higher rates of restenosis (48.5% vs. 30.4%), myocardial infarction (8.8% vs. 3.0%), and re-intervention (53.7% vs. 34.1%).
- Event-free survival was lower in UA patients (43.4% vs. 61.3%), and unstable angina was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Balloon angioplasty in UA patients is associated with increased periprocedural complications, restenosis, and re-intervention rates compared to SA patients.
- Despite a higher incidence of cardiovascular events in UA patients, 5-year survival rates were comparable, with no significant difference in cardiac mortality.
- Unstable angina is a significant independent predictor of poorer long-term outcomes after balloon angioplasty.
Unlabelled:
Comparison of balloon angioplasty results in 472 patients with stable angina (SA) and 158 patients with unstable angina (UA) in 5-year follow-up is reported. Clinical success rate did not differ significantly, while periprocedural complications rate was higher in UA group (22.3 vs. 11.1%, P<0.001). During follow-up UA patients demonstrated higher: restenosis rate (48.5 vs. 30.4%, P<0.001), incidence of myocardial infarction (8.8 vs. 3.0%, P=0.004), although cardiac mortality did not differ significantly (2.2 vs. 1.6%). Reintervention rate in patients with unstable angina resultant from restenosis or significant artherosclerosis progression in coronary vessels, or originating from both of them, was also higher (53.7 vs. 34.1%, P<0.001). Event-free survival was significantly lower in UA patients (43.4 vs. 61.3%, P=0.02). The uni- and multivariate analysis proved that unstable angina was an independent risk factor in restenosis, re-intervention and cardiac events rate, despite perceptible differences in the baseline characteristics. Sub-group analysis of UA patients according to Braunwald classification revealed lower success rate and higher incidence of myocardial infarction during follow-up in post-infarction angina (class C), whereas new onset, no-rest angina (class I) had higher event-free survival in comparison with rest angina (classes II and III).
Conclusions:
UA patients treated by balloon angioplasty had higher periprocedural complications rate, as well as restenosis and re-intervention rate. Despite higher cardiovascular events rate during 5-year follow-up in UA group, survival rate in both groups was high and cardiac mortality did not differ significantly. Unstable angina constitutes a strong independent risk factor in adverse long-term outcome.
Related Concept Videos
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care