Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring central executive functioning: what's in a reading span?

P Whitney1, P A Arnett, A Driver

  • 1Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820, USA. pwhitney@mail.wsu.edu

Brain and Cognition
|February 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploring cold sensitivity among workers with hand-arm vibration syndrome.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Exploring psychological impact of hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS).

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

A much needed metric: Defining reliable and statistically meaningful change of the oral version Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2021
Same author

Tired of not knowing what that fatigue score means? Normative data of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS).

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2020
Same author

Corrigendum to: A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test-Oral version [Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 43 (2020) 102154].

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2020
Same author

A new look at an old test: Normative data of the symbol digit modalities test -Oral version.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2020
Same journal

Gelastic dysarthria: Speech-triggered pathological laughter with evidence for a selective pontine gating mechanism.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Brain correlates of linguistic-cognitive stimulation in neurotypical and Atypical older adult populations: A systematic review.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Effects of Dieting on Neural Encoding of Preferences for Edible and Non-Edible Rewards: An ERP Study.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Structural complexity of brain regions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Spatial navigation training enhances performance on large-scale and small-scale spatial tasks through different neural mechanisms.

Brain and cognition·2026
Same journal

Unraveling the link between brain injury and enhanced artistic skills.

Brain and cognition·2026
See all related articles

The Reading Span Test (RST) involves more than just processing speed. Manipulation capacity and susceptibility to interference are key factors, offering insights into central executive functions.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • The Reading Span Test (RST) is widely used in cognitive and neuropsychological research.
  • The precise cognitive operations underlying RST performance are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific mental operations contributing to Reading Span Test performance.
  • To determine the roles of processing speed, manipulation capacity, and interference susceptibility in RST outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Tested 80 undergraduate students.
  • Examined the contributions of processing speed, manipulation capacity, and susceptibility to interference to RST performance.

Main Results:

  • RST performance is not solely dependent on unitary central executive or processing speed functions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulation capacity and susceptibility to interference emerged as two significant underlying factors.

    • Conclusions:

    • Reading Span Test performance is influenced by multiple cognitive factors beyond simple processing speed.
    • Further research into RST operations can enhance understanding of the central executive.