Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional cell counting: a practical perspective.

F M Benes1, N Lange

  • 1Laboratory of Structural Neuroscience, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA. benesf@mclean.harvard.edu

Trends in Neurosciences
|February 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dimethyl Fumarate, But Not Rituximab, Reduces Serum GFAP Levels and PIRMA in Relapsing-Remitting MS.

Annals of clinical and translational neurology·2026
Same author

Clinical symptoms and surgical outcome of colloid cysts of the third ventricle: A multicenter retrospective study.

Brain & spine·2025
Same author

Definition of Local Spatial Densities in Hadrons.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Design, synthesis and in vitro evaluation of β-glucuronidase-sensitive prodrug of 5-aminolevulinic acid for photodiagnosis of breast cancer cells.

Bioorganic chemistry·2018
Same author

Multivariate characterization of white matter heterogeneity in autism spectrum disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2017
Same author

Toward dissecting the etiology of schizophrenia: HDAC1 and DAXX regulate GAD67 expression in an in vitro hippocampal GABA neuron model.

Translational psychiatry·2016
Same journal

Emulating the periodic table: A unified list of CNS terms and abbreviations for humans and experimental animals.

Trends in neurosciences·2026
Same journal

From chromatin dynamics to brain disease: Polycomb-Trithorax mechanisms in neurodevelopment.

Trends in neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Striatum regulates the cortex via the basal forebrain cholinergic system: A role for substance P.

Trends in neurosciences·2026
Same journal

A large brain adds new types of neurons: Molecular and functional signatures of spindle neurons in the human neocortex.

Trends in neurosciences·2026
Same journal

Exercise as a regulator of glymphatic function.

Trends in neurosciences·2026
Same journal

The neural basis of laughter.

Trends in neurosciences·2026
See all related articles

Two-dimensional (2-D) cell counting methods offer practical and potentially more accurate neuronal estimates than three-dimensional (3-D) approaches. Both methods have inherent biases, but 2-D techniques are more resource-efficient for neural system studies.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Quantitative Biology
  • Stereology

Background:

  • A debate exists regarding the necessity of three-dimensional (3-D) versus two-dimensional (2-D) counting methods for unbiased neuronal quantification.
  • Two-dimensional (2-D) methods are often criticized as assumption-based and inaccurate, while 3-D methods are promoted for unbiased neuronal counts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of 2-D and 3-D cell-counting methodologies in neuroanatomy.
  • To compare these methods based on predictive performance regarding bias, variance, and fidelity to cellular spatial arrangements.
  • To assess the practical implications, including human resource requirements, of each counting approach.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of 2-D and 3-D cell-counting techniques in neural systems research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of methodologies based on statistical performance metrics (bias, variance) and spatial fidelity.
  • Consideration of practical resource allocation (human resources) for implementing each method.

    • Main Results:

    • All scientific methodologies, including both 2-D and 3-D counting, are inherently assumption-based and possess biases.
    • When considering predictive performance and resource efficiency, 2-D methods present a more practical alternative.
    • In certain contexts, 2-D counting may yield more scientifically accurate neuronal estimates than 3-D methods.

    Conclusions:

    • The dichotomy between 'assumption-based' 2-D and 'unbiased' 3-D counting is an oversimplification.
    • Two-dimensional (2-D) cell counting offers a practical and potentially superior approach for neuronal quantification in neuroanatomy studies.
    • Methodological choices should balance statistical rigor with practical constraints and the specific research questions.