Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 17, 2026

Spectral Confocal Imaging of Fluorescently tagged Nicotinic Receptors in Knock-in Mice with Chronic Nicotine Administration
Published on: February 10, 2012
A pharmacokinetic crossover study to compare the absorption characteristics of three transdermal nicotine patches
R V Fant1, J E Henningfield, S Shiffman
1Pinney Associates, Suite 1000, 4800 Montgomery Lane, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. rfant@pinneyassociates.com
Abstract:
We compared the pharmacokinetic profiles of the highest marketed doses of three different patch systems using a crossover study design. Specifically, each of the 25 subjects was assigned to receive the Pharmacia-Upjohn (McNeil) 15-mg, 16-h patch, the Novartis 21-mg, 24-h patch, and the Alza (SmithKline Beecham) 21-mg, 24-h patch. Subjects used each patch for 3 consecutive days, applying a new patch each morning. Plasma nicotine concentrations were measured 15 times during the first 24-h period and at 48, 48.5, 49.5, and 51 h following initial patch application. Measures of total nicotine absorbed (AUC), maximum plasma nicotine concentration (C(max)) and minimum plasma nicotine concentration (C(min)), were higher for the 21-mg, 24-h patches than for the 15-mg, 16-h patch during both the first day of dosing and during the modeled steady-state period (48-72 h after initial application). Within the 21-mg, 24-h patch systems, the Alza patch produced significantly higher AUC and C(max) values during acute dosing and during steady state, but there was no difference between C(min) values. The time to reach C(max) (T(max)) was fastest for the Alza patch system; the Pharmacia-Upjohn patch produced a faster T(max) than the Novartis patch. These results indicate that there are significant differences between the pharmacokinetics of the currently marketed patch systems, which may be important for effective relief of withdrawal symptoms and cigarette craving.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Methods for Studying Drug Absorption: In vitro
The diffusion cell method uses a two-compartment cell, including a donor compartment with the drug solution, which simulates the environment where the drug is applied, and a receptor compartment with a buffer solution, which simulates the environment...
Methods for Studying Drug Absorption: In situ
The Doluisio method involves perfusing a prepared segment of a rat's small intestine with a solution of radiolabeled drug and a non-absorbable marker. This helps to differentiate between absorbed and non-absorbed drug concentrations. The intestinal segment is connected at both ends using tubing and syringes,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

