Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

International Intraocular Lens & Implant Registry.

J T Holladay1

  • 1Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Houston, Texas, USA. holladay@dcholladay.com

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|February 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2001
Same author

Intraocular lens power calculations in patients with extreme myopia.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2000
Same author

Ultrasonographic measurement of induced myopia associated with capsular bag distention syndrome.

Ophthalmology·2000
Same author

Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy.

American journal of ophthalmology·2000
Same author

International Intraocular Lens & Implant Registry 2000.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2000
Same author

Analysis of edge glare phenomena in intraocular lens edge designs.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·1999
Same journal

Light adjustable lens implantation with cataract surgery in eyes with macular pathology.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Use of intracameral antibiotics prophylaxis in patients with posterior capsule rupture during cataract surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Dehydration and Rehydration Behavior of Ultra-High-Fluence Extracorporeal Cross-Linked Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (ECO-CAIRS).

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Deep Learning for Predicting Postoperative Vault and Selecting ICL Sizes Using AS-OCT and UBM Images.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Reply: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Evaluating large language models vs residents in cataract and refractive surgery: comparative analysis using the American Academy of Ophthalmology Self-Assessment Program.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

The International Intraocular Lens & Implant Registry

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • The International Intraocular Lens & Implant Registry provides an annual update on available devices.
  • Tracking advancements in ophthalmic implants is crucial for surgical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present the third annual update of the International Intraocular Lens & Implant Registry.
  • To document the landscape of intraocular lenses (IOLs) and nonoptical implants in 2001.

Main Methods:

  • Data compilation from the International Intraocular Lens & Implant Registry.
  • Cataloging of intraocular lenses (IOLs) and nonoptical implants by manufacturer.

Main Results:

  • In 2001, 1307 different intraocular lenses (IOLs) or nonoptical implants were available.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These devices were offered by 34 distinct manufacturers.

    • Conclusions:

    • The registry serves as a vital resource for ophthalmic surgeons.
    • The data reflects the diversity of implantable devices available in 2001.