Related Experiment Videos
Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with apple
K Skamstrup Hansen1, H Vestergaard, P Stahl Skov
1Allergy Unit, National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allergy
|February 13, 2001
Summary
This study evaluated double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) for apple allergy in birch pollen-allergic individuals. Freeze-dried apple powder showed promise for accurate allergy testing.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Food Science
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Apple allergy is common in individuals with birch pollen allergy.
- Accurate diagnostic methods are crucial for managing food allergies.
- Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) are the gold standard for diagnosing food allergies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate different DBPCFC methods for apple allergy.
- To compare the sensitivity and reliability of fresh apple juice, grated apple, and freeze-dried apple powder.
- To characterize freeze-dried apple material for allergy testing.
Main Methods:
- Three DBPCFC models were tested: apple juice, grated apple, and freeze-dried apple powder.
- Challenges were conducted in birch pollen-allergic patients with a history of apple allergy.
- Freeze-dried apple material was analyzed using leukocyte histamine release (HR), skin prick tests (SPT), and immunoblotting.
Main Results:
- DBPCFC with apple is feasible in birch pollen-allergic individuals.
- Fresh apple juice model showed low sensitivity and high placebo reaction rate.
- Grated apple and freeze-dried apple powder models had sensitivities of 0.74 and 0.60, respectively.
Conclusions:
- Freeze-dried apple powder is a viable option for DBPCFC, SPT, and HR testing.
- Further research is needed on the stability and allergenic profile of freeze-dried apple powder.
- Improved sensitivity in DBPCFC models for apple allergy is desirable.