Related Experiment Videos
Isonymy structure of USA population
I Barrai1, A Rodriguez-Larralde, E Mamolini
1Department of Biology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara I-44100, Italy. v09@dns.unife.it
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|February 15, 2001
Summary
Population mobility in the United States is high, with surname distributions showing significant mixing across regions. Despite geographic clustering, exceptions like California and New Jersey highlight diverse population dynamics and gene flow.
Area of Science:
- Population Genetics
- Anthropology
- Sociology
Background:
- Understanding population structure and migration patterns is crucial for demographic and genetic studies.
- Isonymy, the study of shared surnames, offers insights into historical population movements and genetic relatedness.
- Previous research has explored surname distributions, but a comprehensive analysis across the continental US using large datasets was needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the isonymy structure of the 48 continental United States using a large-scale surname dataset.
- To investigate the correlation between geographic distance and surname similarity (isonymy).
- To identify population clusters and understand migration patterns and genetic mixing across the US.
Main Methods:
- Utilized surname distributions from 18 million telephone users across 247 towns in the continental US.
- Calculated Lasker's distance to quantify isonymy between geographic locations.
- Constructed a dendrogram based on isonymy distances to visualize state clusters and relationships.
Main Results:
- A weak but significant correlation (r = 0.21) was found between Lasker's distance and geographic distance, indicating limited isolation by distance.
- The US states clustered into several groups, generally correlating with geography, but with notable exceptions like California and New Jersey clustering together.
- Hispanic surnames were frequent in Illinois, New Jersey, and California, while the south-central US showed the highest inbreeding, and coastal areas exhibited greater surname heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
- The study reveals high population mobility and significant mixing of diverse origins across the United States.
- Geographic proximity does not strongly predict surname similarity, suggesting substantial gene flow.
- Regional variations in inbreeding and surname heterogeneity point to complex demographic histories and migration patterns within the US.