Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pericardiocentesis Guided by Two-Dimensional Echocardiography.

John A. Callahan1, James B. Seward

  • 1Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
|February 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of echodirected pericardiocentesis in a large clinical series. Using two-dimensional echocardiography to guide needle placement, the procedure was performed on 610 patients at the Mayo Clinic between 1980 and 1994. The study found no deaths and a low complication rate, suggesting that the method is safe and reliable. The first 500 cases showed five serious and 18 nonthreatening complications, indicating a strong safety profile. The procedure was successfully performed by multiple physicians, demonstrating its reproducibility. The authors suggest that echodirected pericardiocentesis is well-suited for primary care settings and that physicians trained in 2-D echocardiography can perform it safely. The study supports the adoption of this technique as a standard clinical practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three-Dimensional Imaging Used for Virtual Dissection, Image Banking and Physical Replication of Anatomy and Physiology.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Precision and Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volume Measurement Using Rotational Geometry with Variable Numbers of Slice Resolution.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Rapid Three-Dimensional Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography: Volumetric Quantitation of Nonperfused Myocardium After Intravenous Contrast Administration.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Transvascular Imaging: Feasibility Study Using a Vector Phased Array Ultrasound Catheter.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2001
Same author

Reference Techniques for Left Ventricular Volume Measurement by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Determination of Precision, Accuracy, and Feasibility.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·1997
Same author

Absent Pulmonary Valve: Echocardiographic Features.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·1997

Area of Science:

  • Interventional cardiology
  • Medical imaging
  • Clinical procedures

Background:

Pericardial effusions can pose a serious threat to patient health, particularly when they lead to hemodynamic instability. Prior research has shown that traditional pericardiocentesis techniques carry a risk of complications, including cardiac tamponade and procedural failure. The introduction of echocardiography as a guiding tool marked a shift in clinical practice. However, no prior work had resolved whether echodirected methods could consistently reduce risks while maintaining procedural efficiency. This uncertainty drove the adoption of two-dimensional echocardiography in pericardiocentesis at the Mayo Clinic. Earlier studies suggested that echocardiography could improve procedural accuracy, but they lacked large-scale validation. The absence of comprehensive data on long-term outcomes left a gap in clinical confidence. Physicians sought a safer, more reliable alternative to traditional blind techniques. The Mayo Clinic’s decision to implement echodirected pericardiocentesis reflected a need for evidence-based procedural innovation.

Purpose Of The Study:

Keywords:
Echodirected pericardiocentesisTwo-dimensional echocardiographyPericardial effusion treatmentClinical procedure safety

Frequently Asked Questions

The study found no deaths among 610 consecutive cases, with low complication rates and high procedural success.

It guides needle placement, allowing for precise and safe pericardial tap execution.

The study suggests that echocardiography reduces procedural risks by improving needle accuracy and avoiding cardiac injury.

The authors propose that physicians trained in 2-D echocardiography can perform the procedure safely and effectively.

Related Experiment Videos

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of echodirected pericardiocentesis in a large clinical series. The specific problem addressed was the lack of long-term data on echocardiography-guided pericardial taps. The motivation stemmed from the need to confirm whether this technique could reliably reduce complications while maintaining procedural success. The study sought to document outcomes across a broad range of physician operators to assess reproducibility. It also aimed to quantify the frequency of both serious and nonthreatening complications. Researchers wanted to determine whether echodirected methods could be safely adopted in primary care settings. The study focused on a consecutive cohort of patients to ensure generalizability. The goal was to establish echocardiography as a standard tool in pericardiocentesis practice.

Main Methods:

The study analyzed 610 consecutive cases of echodirected pericardiocentesis performed at the Mayo Clinic between April 1980 and January 1994. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to guide needle placement in all procedures. The first 500 cases were examined in detail to assess complication rates. Researchers categorized complications as either serious or nonthreatening based on clinical impact. No deaths were recorded in the full series of 610 cases. The study tracked procedural outcomes across multiple physician operators to evaluate reproducibility. Data collection included procedural success, complication frequency, and patient follow-up. The analysis focused on identifying trends in safety and procedural efficiency.

Main Results:

The study found no deaths among the 610 consecutive echodirected pericardiocentesis cases. In the first 500 detailed cases, five serious complications and 18 nonthreatening complications were recorded. The overall complication rate was low, suggesting high procedural safety. The success rate across multiple physician operators indicated strong reproducibility. Two-dimensional echocardiography allowed for precise needle placement in all cases. The absence of mortality highlights the technique’s safety profile. The study also demonstrated that echodirected pericardiocentesis is cost-effective. These results suggest that the method is well-suited for primary care settings.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that echodirected pericardiocentesis is a safe and effective method for managing pericardial effusions. They suggest that this technique reduces procedural risks compared to traditional methods. The study’s findings support the use of echocardiography as a guiding tool in pericardiocentesis. The low complication rate across multiple operators indicates strong procedural consistency. The absence of mortality in 610 cases suggests high clinical reliability. The authors propose that this method is well-suited for primary care settings. They suggest that physicians trained in 2-D echocardiography can perform the procedure safely. The study’s results support the adoption of echodirected pericardiocentesis as a standard clinical practice.

It revealed five serious and 18 nonthreatening complications, supporting the technique’s safety profile.

The study suggests that echodirected pericardiocentesis is well-suited for primary care settings.