Related Experiment Videos
A comparison of functional outcomes after hip fracture in group/staff HMOs and fee-for-service systems
E A Coleman1, A M Kramer, J C Kowalsky
1University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA. Eric.Coleman@uchsc.edu
Context:
Previous studies examining differences in the quality of care between capitated and fee-for-service payment systems have focused on the care delivered in a single setting. No study to date has compared outcomes over an entire episode of care delivered across multiple settings.
Objective:
To compare outcomes of care for patients receiving institutional rehabilitation for hip fracture in fee-for-service and group/staff HMO delivery systems.
Design:
One-year prospective inception cohort.
Setting:
Six hospital-based, integrated care systems paid on a traditional fee-for-service model and five group/staff HMOs (paid fixed capitation rate by Medicare). The 11 delivery systems were selected because of their commitment to geriatric rehabilitation.
Patients:
196 fee-for-service and 140 group/staff HMO patients with acute hip fracture were identified on admission to inpatient rehabilitation.
Measures:
Four primary outcomes--recovery of activities of daily living, improvement in ambulation, return to community living, and mortality--were measured at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Service utilization was assessed in the acute-care hospital setting, rehabilitation setting, and at each 3-month follow-up interval. Risk adjustment was performed by using multiple and logistic regression.
Results:
Overall, no differences were found between patients in group/staff HMOs and fee-for-service patients. Group/staff HMO patients experienced improved functional recovery at 6 months (P < 0.01) and improved ambulation at 12 months (P = 0.05) compared with fee-for-service patients, although these were isolated findings. With regard to utilization, group/staff HMO delivery systems used physician services less intensively and substituted less-skilled allied health personnel.
Conclusion:
Compared with fee-for-service delivery systems, with a similar commitment to excellence in geriatric rehabilitation, group/staff HMOs can achieve equivalent outcomes in older patients recovering from hip fracture with less-intense service utilization.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:29Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
01:17Healthcare Agencies II
Parish nursing is a growing specialty nursing profession that focuses on holistic healthcare, health promotion, and illness prevention. It blends professional nursing practice with a health ministry, focusing on health and healing within the context of a Christian community. Parish nurses serve as health educators, referral sources, and lay...
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:11Secondary Healthcare System