Related Experiment Videos
[Assessment of teaching at the faculties of medicine in Germany]
1Geschäftsstelle des Medizinischen Fakultätentages (MFT) der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. mft@mft-online.de
Background And Objectives:
The aim of this study was to gather, against the background of a long-discussed deficit in academic teaching, data on the current activities of medical faculties with regard to teaching, and to analyse these findings. Another aim was to obtain suggestions for establishing a consensus on indicators that could be used to assess the quality of teaching.
Material And Methods:
In March 2000, a written inquiry was addressed to the deans of all 37 medical faculties in Germany. The questionnaire, arranged so that responses could be entered into a data-base, consisted of ten items in three parts. Part 1 concerned the evaluation of teaching, parts 2 and 3 dealt with the place of specific assessment of teaching in the process of choosing lecturers ("habilitation") and appointing senior professors. In addition to providing alternative answers (in some instances, allowing a choice of several alternatives) there was also space for written comments. The answers were analysed by descriptive statistics.
Results:
All questionnaires were returned in a usable form (response rate 100%). 36 faculties had, at the time of receiving the questionnaire, already instituted teaching assessments, of clinical teaching sessions more often than preclinical ones (97% vs 89%). The most widespread method of assessment consisted of obtaining students' opinion and of using the centralized written examinations of the institute for Medical and Pharmaceutical Examination Questions. In more than half of the faculties (57%) an above-average teaching performance by teachers was acknowledged in special ways (honours/prizes). In 31 faculties (84%) teaching experience counted as an absolute prerequisite for obtaining a lectureship, but as a rule without employing any defined standards. With regard to the selection of senior professors, 27 faculties (73%) explicitly took teaching competence into account. Defined criteria for assessing teaching ability were largely absent.
Conclusions:
The assessment of teaching quality can be considered as well established at medical faculties in Germany. However, the methods and models used are highly heterogeneous. Furthermore, numerous activities exist in the various faculties to increase the importance attached to academic teaching. However, despite using diverse indicators of quality, the central problems for assessing teaching ability remain unsolved.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection.
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.