Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Evaluation of Vascular Control Mechanisms Utilizing Video Microscopy of Isolated Resistance Arteries of Rats
Published on: December 5, 2017
[Process indicators and result indicators in the control of arterial hypertension]
A Dalfó Baqué1, A Sisó Almirall, M A Vila Coll
1adalfob@meditex.es
Insights
Adherence to hypertension monitoring program procedures improved blood pressure control. While procedure compliance varied, better adherence correlated with improved hypertension management outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Hypertension management programs aim for improved patient outcomes.
- Monitoring program adherence is crucial for effective hypertension control.
- Assessing the link between procedural compliance and blood pressure control is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if adherence to hypertension monitoring program procedures improves final blood pressure control.
- To evaluate the relationship between procedural compliance and hypertension management outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted.
- Annual audits of computerized records of hypertensive patients from 1992 to 1996.
- Random sampling of patient records at Gòtic Area Health Centre, Barcelona.
Main Results:
- Complete physical examinations were performed in only 12% of cases in 1996.
- Adherence to multi-component protocols decreased over the study period.
- Significant improvements in blood pressure control were observed, particularly in patients over 65.
Conclusions:
- Procedure indicators remain valuable for designing new hypertension programs.
- Effective hypertension management requires a focus on achieving good control and population impact.
- Procedural adherence is a means to an end, with ultimate goals being improved health outcomes.
Objective:
To find whether better compliance with the indicators of procedure of a hypertension monitoring programme guarantees better control in the final blood pressure figures.
Design:
Descriptive cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Gòtic Area Health Centre, Barcelona.
Patients:
Annual audit through random sampling of the computerised records of all the hypertense patients attended at the centre in each of 5 years (1992, n = 337; 1993, n = 318; 1994, n = 322; 1995, n = 325; 1996, n = 325).
Results:
1. Procedure indicators: complete physical examination took place in 1996 in only 12% of cases, proportion similar to at the start of the development of the programme (12.2%). Completion of at least two of the three records of protocols (complete physical examination, ECG and analysis) dropped during the period and did not cover half the patients. Screening of the various cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) increased markedly in the 1992-1995 period. 2. RESULTS INDICATORS: The proportion of patients under 66 with SP and DP < 140 and 99 mmHg went up from 23.2% in 1992 to 45.2% in 1996. In the over-65 age-group, it went from 58.9% in 1992 to 81.2% in 1996.
Conclusions:
The procedure indicators are still useful, in that they are necessary for designing a new hypertension programme. However, we must not forget that any health programme is designed in order to achieve good control and population impact (survival) results. The procedure is only an aid to reach these aims.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure
The average BP in an adult is typically around 120/80 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). In this measurement, the numerator (120) indicates the systolic pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart's ventricles as blood is expelled. The denominator (80) represents the diastolic...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

