Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Viability evaluation of engineered tissues.

J C Park1, Y S Hwang, H Suh

  • 1Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Yonsei Medical Journal
|February 24, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to letter re: "Artificial intelligence-powered real-time multimodal model for predicting recurrence and survival in head and neck cancer: a multicenter, multinational study".

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence-powered real-time multimodal model for predicting recurrence and survival in head and neck cancer: a multicenter, multinational study.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Limits on WIMP Dark Matter with NaI(Tl) Crystals in Three Years of COSINE-100 Data.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Combined Annual Modulation Dark Matter Search with COSINE-100 and ANAIS-112.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Explainable machine learning models based on clinical trial surrogate outcomes for predicting overall survival in head and neck cancers.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Development of a multi-channel mm-wave interferometer for the versatile experiment spherical torus (VEST).

The Review of scientific instruments·2025
Same journal

The Role of YouTube as an Information Platform for Ovarian Cancer: the Educational Quality and Reliability.

Yonsei medical journal·2026
Same journal

Bone Bridge Effect for the Treatment of Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Multistrategic Approach Using an Anabolic Agent.

Yonsei medical journal·2026
Same journal

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy.

Yonsei medical journal·2026
Same journal

The Risk of Incident Diabetes Mellitus in Relation to Egg Consumption among Working-Aged Korean Adults.

Yonsei medical journal·2026
Same journal

SpyGlass Direct Visualization System: A Cost-Effective Approach Enhancing Nutritional and Immune Recovery in Difficult Bile Duct Stone Management.

Yonsei medical journal·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Antibiotic Use for Urinary Tract Infections: A Qualitative Assessment of Regular Prescribing Practices.

Yonsei medical journal·2026
See all related articles

This review examines cell viability assays for biohybrid artificial organs. Evaluating cell survival, function, and integrity is crucial for assessing engineered tissue viability.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Tissue Engineering
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Biohybrid artificial organs combine synthetic materials with living cells to restore organ function.
  • Assessing the viability of cells within engineered tissues is critical for their success.
  • Existing cell viability assays for mammalian cell cultures can be adapted for engineered tissues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and explore various cell viability assay methods applicable to engineered tissues.
  • To highlight the criteria used in viability assays, including survival, function, and membrane integrity.
  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of different viability assessment techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of established cell viability assays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of criteria used in viability assessment: survival, growth, function, metabolite incorporation, structural changes, membrane integrity.
  • Comparison of assay methodologies for engineered tissue applications.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple assay methods exist, each based on distinct definitions of cell viability.
    • Assays evaluate criteria such as cell survival, metabolic activity, and membrane integrity.
    • Each method presents unique advantages and limitations for assessing engineered tissue viability.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive evaluation of engineered tissue viability requires comparing results from various assay methods.
    • Standardized viability assessment protocols are needed for biohybrid artificial organs.
    • Further research should focus on validating and refining assays for complex engineered tissues.