Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improving the scientist/journalist conversation.

J M Valenti1

  • 1Brigham Young University, Dept. of Communications, HFAC E-509, Provo, UT 84602, USA. valentij@byu.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|March 7, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Communication challenges for science and religion.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2002
Same author

Communicating with environmental and health risk takers: an individual differences perspective.

Health education quarterly·1991
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Scientists and journalists face communication barriers. This review offers strategies for improving science communication and public understanding by emphasizing shared ethics.

Area of Science:

  • Communication Studies
  • Science Journalism

Background:

  • Effective science communication is crucial for public understanding.
  • The relationship between scientists and mass media journalists presents unique challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review barriers hindering effective dialogue between scientists and mass media.
  • To propose strategies for enhancing science communication to the public.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of communication scholarship.
  • Analysis of professional processes in science and journalism.

Main Results:

  • Identified key barriers in scientist-journalist interactions.
  • Highlighted professional process differences as a significant challenge.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Adherence to shared ethical standards can bridge communication gaps.
  • Improving science communication requires mutual understanding and strategic approaches.