Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conducting a systematic review.

T Jones1, D Evans

  • 1Department of Clinical Nursing, Royal Adelaide Hospital/The University of Adelaide.

Australian Critical Care : Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses
|March 10, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Observation of sequential Υ suppression in PbPb collisions.

Physical review letters·2013
Same author

Study of the Dijet mass spectrum in pp → W+jets events at sqrt[s] = 7 TeV.

Physical review letters·2013
Same author

Pion, kaon, and proton production in central Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt[s(NN)] = 2.76 TeV.

Physical review letters·2013
Same author

Implementing a community-based obesity prevention programme: experiences of stakeholders in the north east of England.

Health promotion international·2013
Same author

Search for new physics in the multijet and missing transverse momentum final state in proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV.

Physical review letters·2012
Same author

Removal of TSE agent from plasma products manufactured in the United Kingdom.

Vox sanguinis·2012
Same journal

A novel face scale and National Early Warning Score 2 prediction model to assess deteriorating patients in hospital wards: A quick visual early warning score study.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
Same journal

Conceptualisation of survival after critical illness using Institution-free days as a composite primary outcome by intensive care unit survivors and clinicians: A qualitative study using framework analysis.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
Same journal

What does respiratory physiotherapy look like for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation in Australia? A prospective multicentre audit of practice.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
Same journal

Risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infections with short-term central venous catheters in critically ill adult patients: A multicentre cohort study in China.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
Same journal

Enhancing the adoption of patient engagement in critical care research: Insights from a qualitative study.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
Same journal

Remoteness of residence and mortality after critical illness: An analysis of admissions to Australian intensive care units 2010-2020.

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses·2026
See all related articles

Systematic reviews rigorously summarize health research to guide decisions. These reviews involve planned methods for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing study results for reliable evidence.

Area of Science:

  • Health research methodology
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Increasing volume and variable quality of health literature necessitate reliable research summaries.
  • Systematic reviews are crucial for guiding health care decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the rigorous process of conducting systematic reviews.
  • To highlight the importance of systematic reviews in synthesizing health research.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a detailed research protocol.
  • Systematically searching published and unpublished literature.
  • Critically appraising study quality and extracting outcome data.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews provide a rigorous summary of available evidence.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The process involves predefined inclusion criteria and data synthesis.
  • Results are documented and subject to peer review.

    • Conclusions:

    • Systematic reviews are essential for synthesizing complex health research.
    • Their structured methodology ensures reliable evidence for decision-making.
    • The process enhances the transparency and critique of research findings.