Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition.

T Curran1, D L Schacter, M K Johnson

  • 1Case Western Reserve University, USA. tcurran@psycho.colorado.edu

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|March 13, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation and neurofeedback modulation during episodic future thinking for individuals with suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

Behaviour research and therapy·2024
Same author

Pulmonary thromboembolism in hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a retrospective national study of patients managed in critical care and ward environments in Scotland.

BMJ open·2021
Same author

Pearls and Pitfalls in MR Enterography Interpretation for Pediatric Patients.

Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR·2020
Same author

An fMRI investigation of the relationship between future imagination and cognitive flexibility.

Neuropsychologia·2016
Same author

Cognitive neuroscience analyses of memory: a historical perspective.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Preserved priming of novel objects in patients with memory disorders.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Good and poor memory performers exhibit distinct brain activity patterns during recognition tasks. Enhanced frontal event-related potentials (ERPs) in good performers suggest post-retrieval evaluation, differentiating true and false recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Behavioral studies indicate false recognition of semantically similar words stems from familiarity, unlike true recognition linked to detail recollection.
  • Neuroimaging research (PET, fMRI, ERP) has struggled to consistently differentiate brain activity during true versus false recognition.
  • Individual differences in discriminating studied items from similar lures are significant for understanding recognition processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate neural correlates differentiating true recognition from false recognition in individuals with varying performance levels.
  • To examine event-related brain potentials (ERPs) associated with successful discrimination versus susceptibility to semantic lures.
  • To explore the role of post-retrieval evaluation in recognition memory.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Participants were divided into 'Good' and 'Poor' performers based on their ability to distinguish studied words from semantically similar lures.
  • Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to record event-related brain potentials (ERPs) during a recognition memory task.
  • Analysis focused on differences in ERPs between studied targets, lures, and new items, particularly in parietal and frontal regions across different time windows.

Main Results:

  • Good performers exhibited enhanced late (1000–1500 ms) right frontal ERPs for both targets and lures compared to new items, suggesting active post-retrieval evaluation.
  • Both performance groups showed a parietal ERP 'old/new' effect (400–800 ms).
  • Poor performers uniquely displayed a parietal ERP difference between old items and lures, potentially reflecting less effective recollection-based discrimination.

Conclusions:

  • Late right frontal ERPs appear to reflect post-retrieval evaluation processes, more prominent in individuals with superior recognition discrimination.
  • Parietal and frontal ERP effects dissociate, with parietal effects potentially linked to recollection and frontal effects to post-retrieval monitoring.
  • Individual differences in ERP patterns provide insights into the distinct neural mechanisms underlying true and false recognition.