Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Expansion behaviour of compomer restoratives
1Department of Clinical Dental Sciences and Clinical Engineering, The University of Liverpool, UK.
This study looked at how five types of compomer dental materials expand when exposed to water and artificial saliva. Researchers made small discs of each material and measured how much they grew in size over two months. They found that some materials expanded more than others, with Compoglass-F expanding the most. The study also showed that saliva caused slightly different expansion rates in one material. These findings could help dentists choose materials that stay stable in the mouth over time.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Polymer expansion in restorative dentistry
Background:
Hygroscopic expansion in dental restoratives remains poorly understood. Prior research has shown that some resin-based materials absorb water, leading to dimensional changes. However, the extent of this expansion and its material-specific variability have not been fully characterized. While it was already known that moisture affects polymerization, the long-term behavior of compomer materials in simulated oral environments was unclear. No prior work had resolved the differences in expansion rates between water and saliva immersion. This gap motivated researchers to investigate how various compomer materials respond to hydration over time. Understanding these changes is essential for predicting clinical performance. The study aimed to clarify how hydration affects dimensional stability in compomer restoratives.
Purpose Of The Study:
The goal was to measure hygroscopic expansion in five compomer materials under controlled conditions. Researchers wanted to compare how each material behaves when exposed to water and artificial saliva. They focused on dimensional changes over a two-month period. The study aimed to identify which materials expand the most and how quickly they reach equilibrium. By analyzing expansion rates, the researchers sought to determine if saliva immersion leads to different outcomes than water immersion. They also wanted to assess how hydration affects weight gain in these materials. The motivation was to provide data relevant to clinical material selection. This work addresses a gap in understanding long-term material behavior in moist environments.
Main Methods:
The study used a laser micrometer to track dimensional changes in compomer discs. Five commercially available compomer materials were selected for testing. Discs were prepared with standardized dimensions of 10 mm diameter and 1 mm thickness. Specimens were polymerized under dry conditions for 48 hours. Two control groups were maintained in desiccating chambers. Five specimens per group were immersed in deionized water at 37°C. Another five were placed in artificial saliva at the same temperature. Measurements were taken automatically across 200 points per disc. Weight changes were tracked alongside dimensional data over two months.
Main Results:
After two months, the highest volume expansion was observed in Compoglass-F at 2.45%. Dyract AP expanded by 1.50%, and Elan by 1.53%. F2000 showed a 1.69% increase, while Hytac expanded by 1.44%. Artificial saliva immersion produced similar expansion rates as water for all materials except Hytac. Hytac expanded more in saliva at 1.73%, with a p-value of 0.01. Weight gains were consistently higher in saliva than in water. The time to reach 90% of final expansion varied from 7 days for F2000 to 50 days for Hytac. These findings suggest material-specific hydration responses.
Conclusions:
The study found that hygroscopic expansion varies significantly among compomer materials. Compoglass-F showed the highest expansion rate, while Hytac reached equilibrium the slowest. The authors suggest that saliva immersion may influence expansion differently than water in certain materials. Weight gain differences between immersion types were consistent across all groups. The time to reach 90% of final expansion ranged widely, indicating variable hydration kinetics. These findings imply that material selection should consider long-term dimensional stability. The authors propose that further research could clarify the clinical implications of these expansion rates. No essential role was assigned to any single material property in these results.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study found that hygroscopic expansion varied significantly among five compomer materials, with Compoglass-F expanding the most at 2.45% after two months.
A computer-controlled laser micrometer measured disc diameters across 200 points, tracking changes over two months.
Hytac expanded 1.73% in saliva versus 1.44% in water, with a statistically significant p-value of 0.01.
All saliva-immersed specimens gained more weight than those in water, suggesting differences in moisture absorption.
The time ranged from 7 days for F2000 to 50 days for Hytac, indicating variable hydration kinetics.
The authors propose that material-specific expansion rates should be considered when selecting compomers for clinical use.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bone Remodeling
Step-Growth Polymerization: Overview
Many natural and synthetic polymers are produced by...
Plastic Behavior
Expansion and Contraction in Masonry Walls
To...
Soundness of Cement

