Review times in statistical journals: tilting at windmills?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
1Department of Statistics, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-3143, USA. carroll@stat.tamu.edu
Abstract:
Using limited data, I argue that the review times in statistics are far too long for the field to keep pace with the rapidly changing environment in science. I note that statisticians do not appear to believe in statistics because data on the review process are not widely available to members of the profession. I suggest a few changes that could be made to speed up the review process, although it would appear that a change in our culture is required before the problem will be solved.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Statistical Significance

