Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of two questionnaires with a tri-axial accelerometer to assess physical activity patterns
R M Philippaerts1, K R Westerterp, J Lefevre
1Center for Physical Development Research, Department of Sports and Movement Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, K.U. Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium. renaat.philippaerts@rug.ac.be
International Journal of Sports Medicine
|March 22, 2001
Summary
The Baecke questionnaire is a simple, effective tool for assessing physical activity in large studies. The Tecumseh questionnaire offers more detailed insights into activity patterns and energy expenditure.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Science
- Biomedical Engineering
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Physical activity is crucial for health and fitness.
- Accurate measurement of physical activity is essential for research.
- Questionnaires are common tools, but their validity needs assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate two physical activity questionnaires against objective measures.
- To determine the best questionnaire for large-scale physical activity assessment.
Main Methods:
- 166 men aged 40 participated in the Leuven Longitudinal Study.
- Physical activity was measured using the Baecke and Tecumseh questionnaires.
- Objective movement data were collected using a tri-axial accelerometer (Tracmor) over four days.
- Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 peak) was also assessed.
Main Results:
- Both questionnaires showed significant correlations with accelerometer data (r = 0.26-0.47).
- The Baecke questionnaire was identified as the best overall indicator of physical activity level.
- Tecumseh questionnaire submeasures provided additional details on energy expenditure and activity patterns.
Conclusions:
- The Baecke questionnaire is suitable for large-scale studies due to its simplicity.
- The Tecumseh questionnaire provides more granular data on physical activity and energy expenditure.
- Both methods offer valuable, complementary insights into physical activity assessment.