Related Experiment Videos
Cost-shifting in manged care
E C Norton1, R C Lindrooth, B Dickey
1Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7400, USA.
Mental Health Services Research
|March 22, 2001
Summary
The transition to managed care for mental health services in Massachusetts Medicaid initially lowered per person spending by 24%. Long-term savings were modest at 5%, with evidence of cost-shifting and potential quality improvements.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Public Health Policy
- Healthcare Economics
Background:
- The Massachusetts Medicaid program transitioned from fee-for-service to managed care for mental health services in fiscal year 1993.
- Understanding the financial impact of such transitions is crucial for public healthcare systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the short-term and long-term effects of managed care implementation on total public expenditures for mental health services.
- To investigate potential cost-shifting between public agencies following the managed care transition.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of per-person expenditures before and after the managed care implementation.
- Estimation of expenditures across five specific services paid by three public agencies (Medicaid, Department of Mental Health, managed care vendor).
- Utilized two-part expenditure models to assess cost-shifting and its relation to quality improvements.
Main Results:
- Per-person expenditures decreased by 24% in the first year of managed care, but savings diminished to 5% in the subsequent two years.
- Expenditures decreased for services paid by the managed care vendor, increased for Medicaid, and decreased for the Department of Mental Health, indicating cost-shifting.
- Cost-shifting effects were more pronounced for beneficiaries with the highest expenditure levels.
Conclusions:
- The shift to managed care demonstrated initial cost savings, with diminishing returns over time.
- Evidence suggests cost-shifting occurred between public agencies, potentially linked to quality of care improvements.
- The findings have implications for healthcare policy regarding managed care implementation and inter-agency financial dynamics.