Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validating cluster assignments.

D J Ketchen1, G T Hult

  • 1College of Business, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1110, USA. dketchen@cob.fsu.edu

Psychological Reports
|March 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Cluster validity can be established without statistical assessment by ensuring clusters are empirically sound and align with expert knowledge. This approach validates cluster assignments through practical review and expert consensus.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Using ultrasound measurements to predict body composition of yearling bulls.

Journal of animal science·2006
Same author

The effect of milk intake on forage intake and growth of nursing calves.

Journal of animal science·2005
Same author

The role of performance referents in health services organizations.

Health care management review·2001
Same author

Performance and meat quality of beef steers fed corn-based or bread by-product-based diets.

Journal of animal science·2000
Same author

The health care learning organization.

Journal of hospital marketing·1995
Same author

Predicting amino acid adequacy of diets fed to Holstein steers.

Journal of animal science·1993

Area of Science:

  • Data analysis
  • Statistical modeling
  • Cluster analysis

Background:

  • Assessing the validity of cluster assignments is crucial for reliable data interpretation.
  • Traditional statistical methods for cluster validation may not always be feasible or sufficient.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an alternative framework for validating cluster assignments.
  • To explore methods for establishing cluster validity in the absence of rigorous statistical assessment.

Main Methods:

  • The study focuses on qualitative and empirical validation techniques.
  • It emphasizes the importance of expert "buy-in" and "making sense" of the clusters.
  • The approach involves subjecting clusters to "empirical scrutiny".

Main Results:

  • Cluster validity can be developed through a combination of empirical review and expert consensus.
  • The proposed method offers a pragmatic approach when statistical validation is limited.
  • Findings suggest that "making sense" to domain experts is a key component of validity.

Conclusions:

  • Empirical scrutiny and expert validation are viable alternatives for assessing cluster assignments.
  • This approach enhances the interpretability and practical utility of clustering results.
  • The study advocates for a balanced approach integrating statistical and qualitative validation methods.

Related Experiment Videos