Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants.

C M Stanford1

  • 1Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.

Advances in Dental Research
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Surface modifications of dental implants.

Australian dental journal·2008
Same author

Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion: what do we know, and what do we need to find out?

Journal of the California Dental Association·2005
Same author

Removal of supragingival plaque in an intraoral model by use of the Sonicare toothbrush.

Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology·2003
Same author

In situ evaluation of sodium hexametaphosphate-containing dentifrices.

Caries research·2002
Same author

Primary adult human bone cells do not respond to tissue (continuum) level strains.

Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association·2001
Same author

Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2001
Same journal

Institutional Patriarchy, Gender Barriers, and Nigeria's Oral Health Workforce.

Advances in dental research·2025
Same journal

Sex, Gender and Sexuality in Oral Health Research: Setting the Scene.

Advances in dental research·2025
Same journal

Beyond Demographics: Sex, Gender, and Sexuality in Oral Health Research.

Advances in dental research·2025
Same journal

Conceptualisations of Sex and Gender in Oral Health Research.

Advances in dental research·2025
Same journal

Analysing the Interaction of Sex and Laboratory Conditions in Animal Research.

Advances in dental research·2025
Same journal

Advancing Oral Health Workforce Equity in Gender and Sexual Orientation.

Advances in dental research·2025
See all related articles

Achieving a stable implant interface depends on bone quality and biomechanical forces. Optimal implant design and understanding tissue response are key to preventing bone loss and ensuring long-term success.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Biomechanics
  • Dental Implantology

Background:

  • Stable implant interfaces are generally achievable with adequate bone stabilization.
  • Higher-risk implants are associated with compromised bone quality (thin, porous) and minimal trabecular bone (Type IV).
  • Masticatory forces can induce localized changes in bone stiffness due to viscoelastic properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the biomechanical factors influencing long-term implant stability.
  • To understand how bone viscoelasticity and masticatory forces affect the implant interface.
  • To identify strategies for optimizing implant design and tissue response in challenging bone conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of clinical outcomes studies focusing on implant placement in compromised bone.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the impact of masticatory forces on interfacial stiffness and bone properties.
  • Consideration of osteocyte-osteoblast communication in response to mechanical stimuli.

    • Main Results:

    • Compromised bone quality significantly increases implant risks.
    • Viscoelastic properties of bone are crucial in mediating responses to mechanical forces.
    • Altered interfacial stiffness can lead to new bone growth, maintenance, or bone loss.

    Conclusions:

    • Controlling bone modeling and remodeling is essential for implant success.
    • Optimal implant design must account for the mechanical environment and tissue response.
    • A thorough understanding of biomechanics is critical for long-term implant interface stability.