Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.

M J Novotny1

  • 1Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.

The Urologic Clinics of North America
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ureteral obstruction due to colonic duplication.

The Journal of urology·2001
Same author

Efficacy and safety of selamectin against fleas and heartworms in dogs and cats presented as veterinary patients in North America.

Veterinary parasitology·2000
Same author

Safety of selamectin in dogs.

Veterinary parasitology·2000
Same author

Safety of selamectin in cats.

Veterinary parasitology·2000
Same author

Structural and antigenic analysis of a truncated form of the herpes simplex virus glycoprotein gH-gL complex.

Journal of virology·1998
Same author

Purification, primary structures, and antibacterial activities of beta-defensins, a new family of antimicrobial peptides from bovine neutrophils.

The Journal of biological chemistry·1996
Same journal

An Unprecedented Era of Innovation in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Hubert Humphrey's Bladder Cancer: If He Could Have Time Traveled, Would that Have Changed the Outcome?

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Key Clinical Trials Shaping the Future of Superficial High-Risk Bladder Cancer Management.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Future Directions: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools in Bladder Cancer Care.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patient-Centered Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Care.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy provides significant benefits for kidney donors, including faster recovery and reduced costs. Recipient outcomes remain unaffected, making it a favorable surgical option.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Transplantation

Background:

  • Traditional open donor nephrectomy is associated with significant donor morbidity.
  • Advancements in surgical techniques aim to improve donor outcomes and reduce recovery time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the advantages of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy compared to the open approach.
  • To assess the impact of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on both donor and recipient outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy procedures.
  • Review of donor recovery metrics and recipient allograft function and survival rates.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy leads to shorter hospital stays and reduced pain for donors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Donors experience an earlier return to daily activities and employment after laparoscopic procedures.
  • Recipient outcomes, including allograft function and survival, are not negatively impacted by laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
  • Conclusions:

    • Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy offers superior benefits for kidney donors compared to the open approach.
    • The procedure ensures comparable or improved outcomes for recipients, making it a safe and effective alternative.