Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expectancy as basically a short-term process.

M E Wingate

    Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
    |March 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Current stuttering expectancy explanations are inadequate. This study offers a new, more accurate explanation for the expectancy phenomenon in stuttering, supported by novel experimental conditions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    SLD is not stuttering.

    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2001
    Same author

    Comments on Postma & Kolk's "The covert repair hypothesis: prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies" (1993)

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1994
    Same author

    Definition is the problem.

    The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1984
    Same author

    Knowing what to look for: comments on stuttering identification--standard definition and moment of stuttering.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1981
    Same author

    On the Hegde-Daly and Kimbarow exchange.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1980
    Same author

    The first three words.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1979
    Same journal

    Temporal resolution in infancy and subsequent language development.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Narrative development in late talkers: early school age.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    A system for the diagnosis of specific language impairment in kindergarten children.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Interactive focused stimulation for toddlers with expressive vocabulary delays.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    Same journal

    Auditory lexical decisions of children with specific language impairment.

    Journal of speech and hearing research·1996
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Speech and Language Pathology
    • Psychology of Communication

    Background:

    • The expectancy phenomenon in stuttering describes the tendency for individuals who stutter to anticipate moments of disfluency.
    • Existing explanations for this phenomenon have been widely accepted but lack empirical validation under realistic conditions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To rigorously investigate the expectancy phenomenon in stuttering.
    • To re-evaluate the adequacy of current explanations for stuttering expectancy.
    • To propose a revised theoretical framework for understanding stuttering expectancy.

    Main Methods:

    • Experimental investigation of stuttering expectancy under conditions closely mimicking real-world speech scenarios.
    • Controlled observation and analysis of stuttering patterns and anticipatory behaviors.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The study found that current explanations for the expectancy phenomenon in stuttering are insufficient and potentially misleading.
    • Empirical data gathered under more realistic conditions challenge existing theoretical models.

    Conclusions:

    • A new explanation for stuttering expectancy is proposed, which aligns better with the observed data.
    • Further research is warranted to validate the proposed alternative explanation and its clinical implications.