Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pseudoaccountability.

J P Kassirer1

  • 1Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111-1800, USA.

Annals of Internal Medicine
|April 3, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Problem Solving Series.

Acta clinica Belgica·2016
Same author

Clinical Problem Solving Series.

Acta clinica Belgica·2016
Same author

Clinical Problem Solving Series.

Acta clinica Belgica·2016
Same author

Clinical Problem Solving Series Strategies of Information Gathering.

Acta clinica Belgica·2016
Same author

Financial conflict of interest: an unresolved ethical frontier.

American journal of law & medicine·2001
Same author

msJAMA: Why be a medical editor?

JAMA·2001
Same journal

Correction to I.M. Matters News: Sleep medicine for seniors.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Adverse Events After Same-Day COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination Versus Influenza Vaccination Alone : A Target Trial Emulation.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Methodological Approaches to Real-World Evidence Generation for Glucagon-like Peptide-1-Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Weekly and Biweekly Treatment With Bofanglutide Versus Semaglutide in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes : A Phase 2b Randomized Clinical Trial.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Grappling with GLP-1 prescribing.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

The medical profession

Area of Science:

  • Medical ethics
  • Healthcare regulation
  • Professional accountability

Background:

  • The public has historically trusted the medical profession with self-regulation.
  • However, self-regulatory efforts have been inconsistent, leading to 'pseudoaccountability' with weak standards.
  • Failures include managing substandard practitioners, preventing medical errors, inadequate patient record documentation, research protection lapses, and industry financial conflicts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the shortcomings of medical self-regulation.
  • To propose necessary reforms to restore public trust and professional autonomy.
  • To advocate for robust, external oversight mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of current self-regulatory practices in the medical profession.
Keywords:
Bioethics and Professional EthicsHealth Care and Public Health

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of government interventions and their impact.
  • Examination of professional organizations' roles and limitations.
  • Discussion of proposed alternative models for accountability.

    • Main Results:

    • Self-regulation has often resulted in weak standards and ineffective enforcement.
    • Government intervention has increased due to perceived professional failures.
    • Existing professional organizations have not adequately protected the public.
    • Financial arrangements with industry may compromise professional judgment.

    Conclusions:

    • The medical profession must implement rigorous, enforceable standards to maintain public trust and autonomy.
    • Assessment and regulation of medical professionals should be transferred to independent, external bodies.
    • Open public and governmental involvement is crucial for developing non-self-serving regulatory approaches.
    • Failure to reform self-regulation risks further loss of professional authority.