Is it a paradox or misinterpretation?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
1Shanghai Research Centre of Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
The paradox recently raised by Wang and Yuan (Proteins 2000;38:165-175) in protein structural class prediction is actually a misinterpretation of the data reported in the literature. The Bayes decision rule, which was deemed by Wang and Yuan to be the most powerful method for predicting protein structural classes based on the amino acid composition, and applied by these investigators to derive the upper limit of prediction rate for structural classes, is actually completely the same as the component-coupled algorithm proposed by previous investigators (Chou et al., Proteins 1998;31:97-103). Owing to lack of a complete or near-complete training data set, the upper limit rate thus derived by these investigators might be both invalid and misleading. Clarification of these points will further stimulate investigation of this interesting area.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Fundamental Attribution Error
Cognitive Dissonance
Parseval's Theorem
Interestingly, Parseval's theorem also holds for the trigonometric form of the Fourier series, which expresses a...
Introduction to Sequences

