Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.

P A Nobel1, R M Shiffrin

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University Bloomington 47405, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|April 11, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An expectancy model for memory search.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2011
Same author

An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Perceptual inertia: spatial attention and warning foreperiod?

Psychological research·2001
Same author

Perception and preference in short-term word priming.

Psychological review·2001
Same author

A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification.

Psychological review·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study reveals distinct cognitive processes between recognition and cued recall memory retrieval. Cued recall involves a slower, sequential search process compared to faster recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying different memory retrieval processes is crucial.
  • Distinguishing between recognition and cued recall is fundamental in memory research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct processes and relationships between recognition and cued recall using response time (RT) and accuracy.
  • To differentiate the retrieval dynamics of single-item recognition versus cued recall.

Main Methods:

  • Employed free-response and signal-to-respond techniques to measure memory retrieval.
  • Manipulated list length and presentation rate to analyze response time distributions and information accumulation rates.

Main Results:

  • Recognition exhibited significantly lower mean and variance in response time distributions compared to cued recall.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Signal-to-respond curves indicated faster information accumulation in recognition and slower rates in cued recall.
  • Further experiments ruled out output-related delays, confirming slower retrieval processes in cued recall.

    • Conclusions:

    • Retrieval processes fundamentally differ between single-item recognition and cued recall.
    • Cued recall, including associative recognition, appears to rely on a sequential search mechanism.