Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Combined effect of context change and retention interval on interference in causality judgments
J M Rosas1, N Javier Vila, M Lugo
1Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain. jmrosas@ujaen.es
Summary
Retroactive interference in human causal learning is reduced by context changes or longer retention intervals. These factors interact, suggesting forgetting stems from changes in physical or temporal contexts.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Learning and Memory
Background:
- Retroactive interference occurs when newly learned information disrupts recall of previously learned information.
- Context plays a crucial role in memory retrieval and retention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of context change and retention interval on retroactive interference in causal learning.
- To determine how these factors influence spontaneous forgetting.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted involving human participants learning causal relationships.
- Manipulations included changes in physical context and varying retention intervals (e.g., 48 hours).
- Participants' recall performance was assessed to measure retroactive interference.
Main Results:
- Evidence for retroactive interference was found.
- Both a 48-hour retention interval and a context change independently reduced retroactive interference.
- An interaction was observed where the retention interval diminished the effect of context change.
Conclusions:
- Spontaneous forgetting appears to be driven by alterations in the physical or temporal contexts of information acquisition.
- Context and time are significant factors modulating memory interference and recall.
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Forgetting
Forgetting is an intrinsic aspect of human memory, characterized by the gradual loss or inaccessibility of information over time. Hermann Ebbinghaus, a pioneering psychologist, extensively studied this phenomenon and formulated the forgetting curve. This curve illustrates that memory loss occurs rapidly immediately after learning and then decelerates over time. Several mechanisms contribute to forgetting, including encoding failure, storage decay, retrieval failure, and interference.
Encoding...
Encoding...
Interference and Decay
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

