Related Experiment Videos
Ageing, families and welfare systems: comparative perspectives
1Norwegian Social Research (NOVA), P.O. Box 3223 Elisenberg, 0208 Oslo, Norway.
Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie
|April 20, 2001
Summary
Welfare spending shows convergence, but profiles differ. Familistic policies prioritize less home care, while individualistic policies prioritize more, impacting future sustainability.
Area of Science:
- Social Policy
- Welfare State Analysis
- Comparative Sociology
Background:
- Nations exhibit varying welfare spending patterns, with some converging in total expenditure but diverging in service and transfer priorities.
- Welfare states differ significantly in their allocation between cash transfers and social services, and within services, between institutional and community-based care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the relationship between family cultures and welfare system structures.
- To investigate how welfare systems influence family structures and care priorities.
- To assess the sustainability of different welfare models amidst social and demographic changes.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of national welfare spending data.
- Examination of the interplay between familistic and individualistic policy approaches.
- Qualitative assessment of care service priorities (institutional vs. community-based).
Main Results:
- While total welfare spending shows some convergence, the composition of spending (transfers vs. services) remains diverse.
- Countries with familistic policies tend to de-prioritize home care services.
- Countries with individualistic social policies tend to prioritize home care services.
Conclusions:
- Welfare system structures reflect and reinforce distinct family cultures.
- The prioritization of home care is strongly linked to the individualistic or familistic orientation of social policies.
- Future sustainability of welfare models depends on adapting to demographic shifts and evolving care needs.