Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Efficiency robust tests for survival or ordered categorical data.

B Freidlin1, M J Podgor, J L Gastwirth

  • 1Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. freidlinb@ctep.nci.nih.gov

Biometrics
|April 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interim monitoring for non-inferiority trials: minimizing patient exposure to inferior therapies.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Assessing treatment efficacy in the subset of responders in a randomized clinical trial.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Response to comment on: 'evaluation of chemoresponse assays as predictive biomarkers'.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same author

Evaluation of chemoresponse assays as predictive markers.

British journal of cancer·2015
Same author

Extension of the Peters-Belson method to estimate health disparities among multiple groups using logistic regression with survey data.

Statistics in medicine·2014
Same author

Assessing causal relationships between treatments and clinical outcomes: always read the fine print.

Bone marrow transplantation·2011
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Choosing a single analysis method is difficult with multiple potential data models. This study introduces two robust tests, the maximum efficiency robust test (MERT) and the MX procedure, for improved statistical analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Selecting a single analytical method is challenging when data may originate from various statistical models.
  • Existing methods may lack robustness across a range of potential data-generating models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate two novel statistical tests designed for high power across diverse models.
  • To provide robust procedures for survival analysis and ordinal categorical data.
  • To offer guidelines for selecting between the proposed methods.

Main Methods:

  • Introduced the maximum efficiency robust test (MERT), which combines optimal statistics to maximize minimum efficiency.
  • Developed the MX procedure, utilizing the maximum of optimal statistics for model comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the properties and performance of both MERT and MX.

    • Main Results:

    • Both MERT and MX demonstrated efficiency-robustness for survival analysis.
    • Both MERT and MX proved effective for ordinal categorical data analysis.
    • Guidelines for method selection were established based on test properties.

    Conclusions:

    • The MERT and MX procedures offer robust alternatives when the underlying data model is uncertain.
    • These methods enhance statistical power and reliability in survival and categorical data analysis.
    • The study provides practical guidance for researchers in choosing appropriate analytical tools.