Related Experiment Videos
Speech processing strategy preferences among 55 European CLARION cochlear implant users
L E Stollwerck1, K Goodrum-Clarke, C Lynch
1UCL Cochlear Implant Programme, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK.
Summary
Most cochlear implant users preferred the continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) strategy over simultaneous analogue stimulation (SAS). Users performed better with their preferred strategy, which was established early and remained consistent.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Cochlear implant technology offers various signal processing strategies.
- Simultaneous analogue stimulation (SAS) and continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) are two distinct strategies.
- Understanding user preference and performance is crucial for optimizing cochlear implant outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare user preference and performance between SAS and CIS strategies in adult cochlear implant users.
- To determine if preferences change over the initial 3 months of implant use.
- To identify factors influencing strategy preference.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre study involving 55 adult CLARION cochlear implant users.
- Users were programmed with both SAS and CIS strategies and used each for daily listening.
- Performance was assessed using open-set sentence recognition (auditory alone) at 2, 6, and 12 weeks.
- User preference was recorded via questionnaires.
Main Results:
- 75% of users preferred the CIS strategy, while 25% preferred SAS.
- Subjects demonstrated better performance with their preferred strategy.
- Preferences were established early in the 3-month period and did not change.
- Individual performance correlated with strategy preference.
Conclusions:
- Offering a choice between SAS and CIS strategies benefits cochlear implant users.
- User preference is a significant factor in performance outcomes.
- Early establishment of preference suggests timely programming is important for optimal adaptation.