Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

09:29
A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
Modifying a functional obstacle course to test balance and mobility in the community
1Falls and Mobility Disorders Program, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock 72114, USA. meanskevinm@exchange.uams.edu
Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
|April 27, 2001
Summary
A modified functional obstacle course (FOC) maintains performance scores for elderly fallers and non-fallers. Minor time adjustments are recommended for comparing the new FOC version, enhancing its use in mobility research.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Biomechanics
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- The functional obstacle course (FOC) is a tool to assess balance and mobility in the elderly.
- Previous FOC use was hospital-based, requiring parallel bars and extra personnel.
- Modifications were made to adapt the FOC for community-based studies, removing parallel bars.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if modifications to the FOC affect performance scores.
- To compare performance between the original and modified FOC versions in fallers and non-fallers.
- To validate the modified FOC for broader research applications.
Main Methods:
- 36 volunteers (18 fallers, 18 non-fallers) were tested on modified sections of both FOC versions.
- Performance was assessed using summed quality and task completion time scores.
- A two-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the data.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in quality scores was found between the original and modified FOC versions.
- No interaction effect was observed between faller status and FOC version for quality scores.
- Task completion time was approximately 2 seconds longer for the modified FOC, with a similar increase for both fallers and non-fallers.
Conclusions:
- The modified FOC demonstrates comparable performance to the original version for both fallers and non-fallers.
- A 2-second adjustment in time scores is recommended when comparing the two FOC versions.
- The modifications enhance the FOC's utility for extensive and efficient balance and mobility research.

