Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Obstetric litigation: effects on clinical practice.

¹Maternity Unit, Perth Royal Infirmary, Perth, UK. asymon@pri.tuht.scot.nhs.uk

Gynakologisch-Geburtshilfliche Rundschau

|April 28, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Chilean socio-ethno-genomic cline.

Biodemography and social biology·2021

Same author

'I didn't know why you had to wait': an evaluation of NHS infant-feeding workshops amongst women living in areas of high deprivation.

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2014

Same author

Perinatal litigation in Scotland 1980-1995: its incidence, rate and nature.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2004

Same author

Interprofessional and peer criticism: a side-effect of litigation?

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2004

Same author

Pilot study: quality of life assessment of postnatal fatigue and other physical morbidity.

Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology·2004

Same author

The development and pilot evaluation of a nutrition education intervention programme for pregnant teenage women (food for life).

Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association·2003

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Litigation fears in maternity care lead to defensive medicine, impacting obstetric practices like caesarean sections. This study quantifies defensive practices and examines risk management

Area of Science:

Medical Law and Ethics
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Healthcare Management

Background:

Claims about litigation's impact on obstetrics lack comprehensive data.
Concerns exist regarding litigation affecting obstetrician recruitment, retention, and practice styles.
Defensive medicine in maternity care is a significant, yet poorly quantified, phenomenon.

Purpose of the Study:

To define and assess the significance of defensive practice in obstetrics and midwifery.
To quantify the incidence of specific defensive practices in maternity care.
To examine the role of clinical risk management, protocols, and guidelines in mitigating litigation.

Main Methods:

Large-scale postal surveys of obstetricians and midwives in Scotland and England.

Related Experiment Videos

Follow-up interviews to clarify survey findings.

Analysis of defensive practices, particularly in relation to caesarean sections.

Main Results:

Defensive medicine is prevalent in maternity care, notably influencing decisions on caesarean sections.
Survey data quantifies specific examples of defensive practices among obstetricians and midwives.
The study provides empirical evidence on the extent of defensive medicine.

Conclusions:

Defensive medicine significantly impacts maternity care, driven by litigation concerns.
Clinical risk management strategies, including protocols and guidelines, are being implemented to address litigation.
Further research is needed to fully understand and mitigate the consequences of defensive medicine in obstetrics and midwifery.