Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic linkage methods for quantitative traits.

C I Amos1, M de Andrade

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Box 189, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 189, Houston, TX 77030, USA. camos@notes.mdacc.tmc.edu

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|May 2, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic variants in the folate metabolic pathway genes predict cutaneous melanoma-specific survival.

The British journal of dermatology·2020
Same author

Innovations in risk-stratification and treatment of Veterans with oropharynx cancer; roadmap of the 2019 Field Based Meeting.

Oral oncology·2019
Same author

Genome-wide association study across European and African American ancestries identifies a SNP in DNMT3B contributing to nicotine dependence.

Molecular psychiatry·2017
Same author

Taller height as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomization meta-analysis.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2017
Same author

Is there still room for additional common susceptibility alleles for venous thromboembolism?

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016
Same author

Genome-wide meta-analysis reveals common splice site acceptor variant in CHRNA4 associated with nicotine dependence.

Translational psychiatry·2015
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

This study reviews genetic linkage detection methods for quantitative traits. Alternative methods offer unbiased genetic locus estimates, unlike the traditional LOD score method, especially when trait parameters are misspecified.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Quantitative Trait Analysis

Background:

  • Accurate genetic linkage detection is crucial for understanding quantitative traits.
  • Traditional methods like LOD scores can yield biased results under parameter misspecification.
  • Alternative approaches are needed for robust genetic locus identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare methods for detecting genetic linkage in quantitative traits.
  • To highlight the limitations of the LOD score method and present superior alternatives.
  • To discuss ascertainment corrections and time-to-onset data analysis in linkage studies.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of LOD score method with variance component and Haseman-Elston approaches.
  • Evaluation of methods for modeling covariation among relatives based on genetic markers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of ascertainment correction strategies for non-randomly selected samples.
  • Exploration of methods for analyzing time-to-onset data in disease linkage studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Variance component methods provide unbiased estimates of genetic locus location and heritability.
    • Haseman-Elston regression is less powerful but robust, while variance components require trait normality for accurate false positive rates.
    • Simulation results show similar efficiencies for different ascertainment correction approaches in quantitative trait linkage analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Alternative genetic linkage analysis methods offer improved accuracy and robustness over traditional LOD scores.
    • Careful consideration of sampling and trait distribution is necessary for reliable genetic linkage detection.
    • The reviewed methods provide a comprehensive toolkit for quantitative trait and disease linkage studies.