Restoration removal with and without the aid of magnification
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2026

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
A H Forgie1, C M Pine, N B Pitts
1Section of Dental Public Health and Health Psychology, Dundee Dental Hospital and School, Dundee, Scotland. a.h.forgie@dundee.ac.uk
Abstract:
This study aims to quantify any cavity size change following removal of tooth-coloured restorations in vitro using unaided vision and 2.6 x magnification. Occlusal composite restorations were removed under simulated clinical conditions and changes in cavity size were measured, blind to method, using standardized photographs. The outline of the cavity was digitized and its area was used as a surrogate for cavity size. The change in cavity size was determined for unaided vision and 2.6 x magnification, with any differences between the techniques investigated. There were significant increases in cavity size using both techniques and although the increase in size was less when magnification was used, the difference was not statistically significant. Cavity size changes significantly during re-restoration and the use of magnification may be of benefit for some clinicians in reducing the size of the change.
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Microscopy Techniques
Fixation and Sectioning
The simplest type of preparation is the wet mount, in which the specimen is placed in a drop of liquid on the slide. A liquid specimen can be directly deposited on the slide using a dropper. Solid specimens, such as skin scraping, can be placed on the slide before adding a drop of liquid to prepare the wet mount. Sometimes the liquid is simply water, but stains are often added...
