Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current iodinated contrast media.

F Stacul1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Cattinara Hospital, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.

European Radiology
|May 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The safety of low-osmolality contrast media is established, with ongoing research comparing nonionic dimers and monomers. Further studies will clarify optimal use for different medical imaging procedures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ultrasound-guided electrochemotherapy for the treatment of skin metastases of breast cancer: a winning combination of techniques.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2019
Same author

Radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules.

Journal of endocrinological investigation·2016
Same author

Clinical application of low-dose phase contrast breast CT: methods for the optimization of the reconstruction workflow.

Biomedical optics express·2015
Same author

The role of CEUS in the characterization of hepatocellular nodules detected during the US surveillance program--current practices in Europe.

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)·2012
Same author

64-Slice CT urography: optimisation of radiation dose.

La Radiologia medica·2011
Same author

64-Slice CT urography: 30 months of clinical experience.

La Radiologia medica·2010
Same journal

ESR Essentials: pelvic floor imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

STIR or T2-Dixon? A false dilemma in musculoskeletal MRI.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

ESR Essentials: uterine cancers-practice recommendations by the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive quantification for more reproducible amyloid PET interpretation.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

APEX-NET: automated pancreatic evaluation network using early non-contrast CT.

European radiology·2026
Same journal

Temporal bone remodeling after venous stenting for pulsatile tinnitus: isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum.

European radiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Scientific literature on iodinated contrast media is decreasing.
  • High-osmolality agents have been superseded by safer, low-osmolality alternatives.
  • Financial factors remain a barrier to universal adoption of low-osmolality agents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of low-osmolality contrast media (nonionic monomers, ionic dimers) and iso-osmolality contrast media (nonionic dimers).
  • To discuss the relative merits of nonionic monomers versus nonionic dimers.
  • To explore criteria for selecting specific contrast agents based on imaging procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of existing research on iodinated contrast media.
  • Review of clinical trial data comparing different osmolality and ionic profiles.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of pharmacological and clinical properties of contrast agents.

    • Main Results:

    • Nonionic contrast compounds demonstrate superior safety compared to ionic dimers.
    • Low-osmolality agents are significantly safer and better tolerated than high-osmolality agents.
    • Ongoing research focuses on iso-osmolality nonionic dimers versus low-osmolality nonionic monomers.

    Conclusions:

    • The superiority of low-osmolality contrast media is scientifically accepted.
    • The choice between nonionic monomers and nonionic dimers warrants further investigation.
    • Developing guidelines for procedure-specific contrast media selection is crucial.