Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Intensive care--a cost effective option for developing countries?

¹Centre for Outcomes Research and Quality Management, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. rsachdeva@chw.org

Indian Journal of Pediatrics

|May 24, 2001

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cost-effectiveness of Project ADAM: a project to prevent sudden cardiac death in high school students.

Pediatric cardiology·2004

Same author

Measuring the impact of new technology: an outcomes-based approach.

Critical care medicine·2001

Same author

SureSmile technology in a patient--centered orthodontic practice.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·2001

Same author

Development of a survey to measure parent satisfaction in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Critical care medicine·2000

Same author

Perioperative management of the pediatric transplant patient.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2000

Same author

Precision finishing in lingual orthodontics.

Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO·1999

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of pediatric critical care is vital for resource allocation. Identifying which children benefit most is complex, impacting healthcare policy and public services.

Area of Science:

Health Economics
Pediatric Critical Care
Public Health Policy

Background:

Pediatric critical care services are costly, with long-term outcomes often unclear.
Assessing cost-effectiveness is crucial for resource allocation in healthcare systems.
Patient benefits are evident, but identifying optimal beneficiaries complicates policy decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the economic evaluations of pediatric critical care services.
To define the differences between charges and costs in healthcare.
To discuss the measurement of costs, benefits, and their link to outcomes research.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on cost-effectiveness in pediatric critical care.
Analysis of various cost analysis types.

Related Experiment Videos

Exploration of ethical implications in economic evaluations.

Main Results:

Cost-effectiveness of pediatric critical care is complex and lacks a single definitive answer.
Literature, particularly from the US, provides insights into economic evaluations.
Ethical considerations are integral to resource allocation decisions.

Conclusions:

Further research and nuanced economic evaluations are needed for pediatric critical care.
Policy decisions must balance healthcare provision with other public services.
Understanding cost-effectiveness is essential for equitable healthcare resource distribution.