Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study.

M R Callstrom1, C D Johnson, J G Fletcher

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Radiology
|May 29, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A case study approach to high-containment laboratory workflows promoting sustainability, networking and innovation.

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)·2022
Same author

Building Patient-Physician Trust: A Medical Student Perspective.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2020
Same author

Establishing the European Norm for the health-related quality of life domains of the computer-adaptive test EORTC CAT Core.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2018
Same author

General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States.

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2018
Same author

Large Draining Focal Fibrous Hyperplasia Secondary to Periapical Granuloma.

Case reports in dentistry·2018
Same author

Impact of place of residence on place of death in Wales: an observational study.

BMC palliative care·2017
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

Optimal stool labeling for computed tomographic (CT) colonography requires a 48-hour preparation period with multiple doses of oral contrast material. This method enhances polyp detection sensitivity, approaching that of traditional colonoscopy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is an emerging technique for colorectal polyp detection.
  • Effective stool labeling is crucial for accurate interpretation of CT colonography findings.
  • Unprepared colons present challenges for differentiating stool from polyps.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess different oral contrast material administration regimens for stool labeling in CT colonography.
  • To determine the sensitivity of contrast-labeled stool for detecting polyps.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty-six patients with suspected polyps underwent CT colonography after receiving varying doses and durations (24 or 48 hours) of oral contrast material.
  • Stool labeling effectiveness was evaluated using CT images.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Colonoscopy served as the gold standard for polyp detection, with results compared to CT findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Stool labeling scores significantly improved with longer administration times and more doses, reaching 88% at 48 hours with seven doses.
    • Polyp detection sensitivity for lesions ≥1 cm reached 100% in groups with adequate stool labeling (e.g., 48 hours, seven doses).
    • Sensitivity for polyp detection in patients with adequate stool labeling approached that of prepared colons.

    Conclusions:

    • A 48-hour oral contrast administration period with multiple doses is necessary for effective stool labeling in CT colonography.
    • Adequate stool labeling improves polyp detection rates, making CT colonography a more reliable tool.
    • This technique offers a promising alternative for colorectal cancer screening.