Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methods for gas chromatography-olfactometry: a review.

S M van Ruth1

  • 1Department of Food Science and Technology, Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, Western Road, Cork, Ireland. s.vanruth@ucc.ie

Biomolecular Engineering
|May 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Similarities and differences of the volatile profiles of six spices explored by Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry.

Food chemistry·2018
Same author

Geographical provenance of palm oil by fatty acid and volatile compound fingerprinting techniques.

Food chemistry·2012
Same author

Authentication of organic feed by near-infrared spectroscopy combined with chemometrics: a feasibility study.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2012
Same author

Gas chromatography/sniffing port analysis of aroma compounds released under mouth conditions.

Talanta·2008
Same author

Interactions between artificial saliva and 20 aroma compounds in water and oil model systems.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2001
Same author

Aroma profiles of vegetable oils varying in fatty acid composition vs. concentrations of primary and secondary lipid oxidation products.

Die Nahrung·2000
Same journal

Proceedings of Symposium J on Surface Functionalization of Biomaterials at the E-MRS 2006 Fall Conference. September 4-6, 2006. Warsaw, Poland.

Biomolecular engineering·2008
Same journal

Overexpression of GLT1 in fps1DeltagpdDelta mutant for optimum ethanol formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Biomolecular engineering·2007
Same journal

Fibrils of different collagen types containing immobilised proteoglycans (PGs) as coatings: characterisation and influence on osteoblast behaviour.

Biomolecular engineering·2007
Same journal

Development of a heat shock inducible and inheritable RNAi system in silkworm.

Biomolecular engineering·2007
Same journal

Effect of site-directed PEGylation of trichosanthin on its biological activity, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics.

Biomolecular engineering·2007
Same journal

Real-time study of the effect of different stress factors on lactic acid bacteria by electrochemical optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy.

Biomolecular engineering·2007
See all related articles

This review explores four gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) methods for identifying food odorants. The choice of GC-O technique significantly impacts flavor research data quality and interpretation.

Area of Science:

  • Food Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Sensory Science

Background:

  • Flavor research relies on identifying odor-active compounds in foods.
  • Gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) is a key technique for this purpose.
  • Understanding different GC-O methods is crucial for accurate flavor analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the four major gas chromatography-olfactometry methods.
  • To discuss the potentials and limitations of each method.
  • To highlight the impact of methodology on flavor research data.

Main Methods:

  • The review describes four primary GC-O techniques: dilution analysis, detection frequency, posterior intensity, and time-intensity methods.
  • Each method's application in flavor research is discussed.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The influence of sample preparation and analytical conditions is considered.

    • Main Results:

    • The value and interpretation of GC-O data are directly influenced by the chosen method.
    • All discussed methods have been widely used, each presenting unique advantages and disadvantages.
    • Methodological advancements are needed to enhance data interpretation and research value.

    Conclusions:

    • The effectiveness of GC-O in flavor research is method-dependent.
    • Further methodological exploration is required to improve data interpretation.
    • Enhanced GC-O techniques will benefit both fundamental and applied flavor research.